Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Assessment of Morphine-induced Hyperalgesia and Analgesic Tolerance in Mice Using Thermal and Mechanical Nociceptive Modalities
Published on: July 29, 2014
Morphine and hydromorphone pharmacokinetics in human volunteers: population-based modelling of interindividual and
Konrad Meissner1, Erik Olofsen2, Albert Dahan2
1Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Background:
Morphine and hydromorphone have differing onsets, magnitudes, and durations of effects and side-effects. Differences between opioids in their interindividual variabilities in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics might influence rational drug selection. Crossover drug studies can provide more informative interindividual variability data than parallel group studies. Using data from a crossover study of i.v. morphine and hydromorphone in healthy volunteers, we tested the hypothesis that morphine and hydromorphone differ in their interindividual pharmacokinetic variability.
Methods:
Arterial opioid and metabolite concentrations from a randomised crossover study in 51 volunteers receiving a 2-h infusion of hydromorphone (0.05 or 0.1 mg kg-1 i.v.) or morphine (total 0.1 or 0.2 mg kg-1 i.v.) 1-2 weeks apart were evaluated with a three-compartmental model for parent opioid and incorporating glucuronides using population modelling (NONMEM). The primary outcome was interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics, based on the coefficient of variation (%CV) of individual model parameters, calculated as √[exp(ω2)-1]×100 where ω2 is the interindividual variability.
Results:
Data were analysed per drug and in a combined morphine-hydromorphone model. Both analyses indicate that interindividual variabilities for hydromorphone and morphine were comparable with %CV ranging from 9% to 31% for structural model parameters (combined analysis). Similarly, additive and relative residual errors had comparable variabilities, 20-40% and 72-87%, respectively, for morphine and hydromorphone (combined analysis).
Conclusions:
Morphine and hydromorphone did not differ in a statistically significant or clinically meaningful manner in their interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. Interindividual pharmacokinetic variability does not appear a meaningful consideration in the choice between these two opioids.
More Related Videos
10:17High-throughput and Comprehensive Drug Surveillance Using Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 23, 2019
09:38Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery
Published on: April 14, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
Opioid Analgesics: Morphine and Other Natural Cogeners
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.