Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ribosome Profiling02:24

Ribosome Profiling

3.5K
Ribosome profiling or ribo-sequencing is a deep sequencing technique that produces a snapshot of active translation in a cell. It selectively sequences the mRNAs protected by ribosomes to get an insight into a cell’s translation landscape at any given point in time.
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique...
3.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predicting tumour and organ dose in α-radiopharmaceutical therapy: a <sup>89</sup>Zr-based dosimetric approach for <sup>225</sup>Ac.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
Same author

Clinical impact of 16S rRNA RC-PCR NGS on infectious disease management.

Microbiology spectrum·2026
Same author

From Genomic Testing to Olaparib Treatment: Real-World Utilization and Outcomes in BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Drugs - real world outcomes·2026
Same author

Genotype-Phenotype Relationships in Azole-Resistant <i>Aspergillus</i>: Two Sides of the Same Coin.

Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

European Reference Networks - a flagship activity of the EU in the field of rare and complex diseases: from 2017 to 2025.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2026
Same author

Impact of Heterogeneous DNA Methylation on the Accuracy of Quantitative Methylation-Specific PCR for Detecting DNA Hypermethylation in Prostate Cancer.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Laser-capture Microdissection of Human Prostatic Epithelium for RNA Analysis
07:42

Laser-capture Microdissection of Human Prostatic Epithelium for RNA Analysis

Published on: November 26, 2015

13.4K

Discovery of RNA Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Using Cross-Platform Transcriptomics.

Wieke C H Visser1, Hans de Jong1, Frank P Smit1

  • 1Department of Product Development, Mdxhealth BV, 6534 AT Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences
|November 27, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Comparing gene expression profiling, microarray and single-molecule molecular inversion probe (smMIP) RNA sequencing showed varied results. Both platforms identified key prostate cancer biomarkers, but smMIP offers sensitive, high-throughput analysis with minimal RNA.

Keywords:
biomarkersgene expression profilingmicroarrayprostate cancer (PCa)single-molecule molecular inversion probes (smMIPs)

More Related Videos

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
13:19

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer

Published on: November 2, 2013

16.5K
Sequencing Small Non-coding RNA from Formalin-fixed Tissues and Serum-derived Exosomes from Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients
12:13

Sequencing Small Non-coding RNA from Formalin-fixed Tissues and Serum-derived Exosomes from Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients

Published on: November 19, 2019

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Laser-capture Microdissection of Human Prostatic Epithelium for RNA Analysis
07:42

Laser-capture Microdissection of Human Prostatic Epithelium for RNA Analysis

Published on: November 26, 2015

13.4K
Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
13:19

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer

Published on: November 2, 2013

16.5K
Sequencing Small Non-coding RNA from Formalin-fixed Tissues and Serum-derived Exosomes from Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients
12:13

Sequencing Small Non-coding RNA from Formalin-fixed Tissues and Serum-derived Exosomes from Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients

Published on: November 19, 2019

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics
  • Biomarker Discovery

Background:

  • Microarray and single-molecule molecular inversion probe (smMIP)-based targeted RNA sequencing are RNA profiling platforms.
  • These platforms are used for identifying disease-associated biomarkers, particularly in complex diseases like prostate cancer (PCa).
  • Understanding their comparative performance is crucial for selecting appropriate research methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of microarray and smMIP-based RNA sequencing.
  • To compare gene expression profiling results from both platforms using prostate tissue samples.
  • To identify potential prostate cancer biomarkers and assess platform concordance.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative gene expression profiling study using RNA from 52 prostate tissues (normal, BPH, PCa).
  • Utilized microarray (GeneChip array with oligonucleotide probes) and smMIP-based targeted RNA sequencing.
  • Analyzed expression levels, identified potential biomarkers, and assessed platform coverage and discrepancies.

Main Results:

  • Only 35% of gene expression levels aligned between microarray and smMIP platforms; 45% showed discrepancies.
  • Both platforms identified 17 common potential PCa biomarkers.
  • Microarray identified 253 additional genes; smMIP identified 8 unique markers, including fusion and splice variants. For high-grade PCa, smMIP identified 8 markers, microarray identified 17, with FOLH1, FAP, CLDN3 common.

Conclusions:

  • The choice between microarray and smMIP RNA sequencing depends on research objectives.
  • Microarray is suitable for broad gene evaluation but has low throughput.
  • smMIP-based RNA sequencing provides sensitive analysis with minimal RNA in a medium- to high-throughput setting.