Cardiac Rehabilitation for Fontan Circulation Patients: A Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis

Luna van de Ven1, Ana Clara Félix2, Joana Suarez2

  • 1Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85090, AB 3508 Utrecht, The Netherlands.

PubMed

Insights

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves exercise capacity in Fontan patients, especially with combined aerobic exercise training (AET) and resistance training. Home-based programs show promise but require cautious interpretation due to potential publication bias.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Exercise Physiology
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Patients with Fontan circulation experience impaired exercise capacity and quality of life despite surgical advances.
  • Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a potential intervention, but its implementation and adherence are inconsistent.
  • This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the safety and efficacy of CR for Fontan patients.

Approach:

  • A systematic literature search was conducted across major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library).
  • Study quality was assessed using Cochrane RoB Tool 2 and STROBE checklist.
  • Meta-analysis employed a continuous random-effects model to evaluate aerobic exercise training (AET), resistance training, and inspiratory muscle training (IMT).

Key Points:

  • CR significantly improved exercise capacity (peak VO2) in Fontan patients (pooled mean difference: 1.947).
  • Combined AET and resistance training demonstrated the most significant benefits (mean difference: 2.11).
  • Home-based interventions showed significant benefits, though publication bias was noted; supervised and hybrid interventions did not show statistically significant differences.

Conclusions:

  • Cardiac rehabilitation, particularly combining AET with resistance training, is effective for enhancing exercise capacity in Fontan patients.
  • Home-based CR programs yield promising results, but findings require cautious interpretation due to potential publication bias in smaller studies.
  • Further research is needed to optimize protocols, assess long-term outcomes, and understand mechanisms, especially in severe cases, reinforcing the safety of CR.