Combining Real-Time Neuroimaging With Machine Learning to Study Attention to Familiar Faces During Infancy: A Proof
Elena Throm1, Anna Gui1,2, Rianne Haartsen1
1Department of Psychological Science, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Infant brain responses to familiar versus unfamiliar faces show individual differences, not a group-level preference by 12 months. Neuroadaptive Bayesian Optimisation (NBO) revealed heterogeneous attentional preferences in infants, explaining
Area of Science:
- Developmental neuroscience
- Cognitive neuroscience
- Infant social cognition
Background:
- Early social development relies on processing familiar and novel faces.
- Neural attention to familiar faces increases in the first 6 months.
- By 12 months, group analyses show no difference in brain responses to familiar versus unfamiliar faces.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate individual infant neural responses to faces varying in familiarity.
- To determine if apparent null findings in group analyses mask heterogeneous individual preferences.
- To apply Neuroadaptive Bayesian Optimisation (NBO) for real-time analysis of infant brain responses.
Main Methods:
- Sixty-one infants (5-12 months) viewed morphed familiar-to-unfamiliar faces.
- Electroencephalography (EEG) recorded brain activity.
- A Bayesian Optimisation algorithm identified stimuli eliciting maximal Negative central (Nc) event-related potential (ERP) amplitude for each infant.
Main Results:
- Neuroadaptive Bayesian Optimisation (NBO) predicted an optimal stimulus in 85% of infants, indicating individual preferences.
- No group-level difference in Nc amplitude was found between familiar and unfamiliar faces.
- Lower attrition rates (15%) were observed compared to traditional methods (22%).
Conclusions:
- The lack of a group-level preference for familiar over unfamiliar faces in middle infancy is due to heterogeneous individual preferences.
- NBO is effective in identifying subgroups with distinct brain activation patterns.
- Individual attentional preferences were not correlated with age or social behavior.
More Related Videos
07:09Gaze in Action: Head-mounted Eye Tracking of Children's Dynamic Visual Attention During Naturalistic Behavior
Published on: November 14, 2018
08:45Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
Published on: October 24, 2012
