Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025
08:01
Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
Published on: October 28, 2020
5.6K
Manipulation Cases in Free Will and Moral Responsibility, Part 1: Cases and Arguments
Gabriel De Marco1, Taylor W Cyr2
1Faculty of Philosophy University of Oxford Uehiro Oxford Institute Oxford UK.
Philosophy Compass
|November 29, 2024
Summary
This paper examines manipulation arguments concerning free will and moral responsibility. It explores how manipulation cases challenge the compatibility of determinism and responsibility, influencing philosophical debates.
Area of Science:
- Philosophy of Mind
- Ethics
- Metaphysics
Background:
- The Manipulation Argument is a prominent line of reasoning in the free will and moral responsibility debate.
- These arguments often utilize hypothetical scenarios involving manipulated agents in deterministic universes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and analyze key types of manipulation cases used in philosophical arguments.
- To outline the structure of manipulation arguments against compatibilism.
- To discuss various responses and issues within the discourse on manipulation and responsibility.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of philosophical arguments.
- Examination of hypothetical agent scenarios.
- Categorization of responses to manipulation arguments (hard-line vs. soft-line).
Main Results:
- Manipulation cases intuitively suggest that manipulated agents lack moral responsibility.
- The paper outlines a schema for constructing manipulation arguments against compatibilism.
- It highlights the diverse range of responses and ongoing issues in the literature.
Conclusions:
- Manipulation arguments pose a significant challenge to compatibilist views on free will and determinism.
- Understanding these arguments requires careful consideration of the nature of manipulation and responsibility.
- The paper provides a framework for navigating complex discussions on these topics.
Related Concept Videos
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
00:56Attribution Theory
12.9K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
12.9K
01:37Reason and Intuition
6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
01:23Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
91
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
91
01:19Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
41
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
41
01:13Torts II
618
Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.
618