Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

188
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
188
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

78
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
78
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

175
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
175
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

3.3K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.3K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.4K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.4K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

102
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
102

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of Blood Levels of Forever Plastics with Lung Cancer Mortality among Ever Smokers in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort Study.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

Rank-based learning: a novel high-throughput algorithm resilient to missing data and effective for datasets with small sample size.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Systemic Immune Correlates of Long-term Survival after Delta-24-RGD Based on the Therapeutic Adenovirus for Recurrent Glioblastoma Effect Trial (TARGET).

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

The LEAP Study: A Multicenter Biospecimen and Imaging Resource for Lung Cancer Screening.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2025
Same author

SMAGS-LASSO: A Novel Feature Selection Method for Sensitivity Maximization in Early Cancer Detection.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2025
Same author

Breast cancer risk assessment: current challenges and the emerging role of blood-based protein biomarkers.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2025
Same journal

Will they use it? Patient and provider acceptance of chatbot screening and counseling for hereditary cancer syndromes in a geographically underserved population.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same journal

The Clinical Application of Refined Risk Estimates (caRe) Study in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same journal

Simvastatin Treatment in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: a Phase II Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial Shows Reduction in IL-6 Levels.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same journal

A Neural Network-Enabled, Enzymatic cfDNA Methylation Assay for Colorectal Cancer Early Detection.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same journal

Comparative Analysis of Breast and Cervical Screening Adaptability at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same journal

Active monitoring versus surgical excision for atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K

A Novel Sensitivity Maximization at a Given Specificity Method for Binary Classifications.

Seyyed Mahmood Ghasemi1, Chunhui Gu1, Johannes F Fahrmann2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Cancer Prevention Research (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|December 2, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new method called sensitivity maximization at a given specificity (SMAGS) improves cancer early detection. SMAGS enhances logistic regression by optimizing biomarker combination rules for better sensitivity and specificity.

More Related Videos

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

19.9K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

19.9K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Machine Learning
  • Biomarker Discovery

Background:

  • Logistic regression (LR) is common for cancer early detection but may not optimize sensitivity or specificity.
  • Maximum likelihood estimation in LR can limit the effectiveness of combination rules.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce an improved regression framework, sensitivity maximization at a given specificity (SMAGS), for binary classification.
  • Develop SMAGS to find optimal linear decision rules for maximizing sensitivity at a given specificity or vice versa.
  • Expand the framework for feature selection to enhance sensitivity and specificity.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the sensitivity maximization at a given specificity (SMAGS) framework for binary classification.
  • Applied SMAGS to find linear decision rules optimizing sensitivity and specificity trade-offs.
  • Expanded SMAGS for feature selection to maximize both sensitivity and specificity.

Main Results:

  • SMAGS demonstrated improved performance over standard logistic regression.
  • In the colorectal cancer CancerSEEK dataset, SMAGS achieved a 14% improvement in sensitivity at 98.5% specificity.
  • The study reported a sensitivity of 0.57 compared to 0.31 with LR (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

  • SMAGS offers a superior alternative to logistic regression for developing biomarker combination rules in early detection.
  • The methodology is applicable to various biomarker and early detection studies, enhancing diagnostic accuracy.
  • SMAGS provides a robust approach for feature selection and optimizing diagnostic performance.