Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
Impact of a Community-University Partnership on the Quality of Life in a Local Community: A Validated Survey
Kiparissenia Samara1, Areti-Dimitra Koulouvari1, Evangelia-Georgia Kostaki2
1Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Department of Public and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Background:
The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a self-reported instrument exploring the perceived potential contribution and impact of a community-university partnership (CUP) on the local community's quality of life.
Methods:
A 13-item questionnaire was developed and administered to a convenience sample of 65 residents of the municipality of Egaleo, a metropolitan area of Athens, Greece, where the main campus of the University of West Attica is located. The questionnaire was self-administered and filled in at two different time points by the same participants. The 13 items of the questionnaire, pertaining to health promotion and wellness, research, upgrading of services, economic development, infrastructures, physical activity, cleaning services, green sector, social protection, kindergarten/nursery services, education, cultural sector, and technical works, were stated in the form of a three-point Likert scale. Factor analysis was performed, and the underlying factors' reliability, convergent, and discriminant validity as well as the test-retest reliability were assessed.
Results:
The mean age of participants was 46 years; 70.8% were females. All items of the questionnaire were retained in the factor analysis; the latter revealed the existence of two underlying factors, interpreted as "overall, comprehensive impact of the CUP" and "domain-specific contributions of the CUP." High reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.860 and 0.880 for the two factors, respectively) and convergent and discriminant validity were documented; the test-retest reliability indicated a stable tool for both factors (Spearman's rho = 0.85 and 0.83, respectively, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
The instrument can be used in the future; surveys are expected to provide further, valuable insight on several aspects of the CUP.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Surveys
Data Collection by Survey
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Cross-Sectional Research
Reliability and Validity

