Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Topological embedding and directional feature importance in ensemble classifiers for multi-class classification
Eloisa Rocha Liedl1,2, Shabeer Mohamed Yassin1,3, Melpomeni Kasapi1,4
1Section of Bioinformatics, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Cancer is the second leading cause of disease-related death worldwide, and machine learning-based identification of novel biomarkers is crucial for improving early detection and treatment of various cancers. A key challenge in applying machine learning to high-dimensional data is deriving important features in an interpretable manner to provide meaningful insights into the underlying biological mechanisms We developed a class-based directional feature importance (CLIFI) metric for decision tree methods and demonstrated its use for The Cancer Genome Atlas proteomics data. The CLIFI metric was incorporated into four algorithms, Random Forest (RF), LAtent VAriable Stochastic Ensemble of Trees (LAVASET), and Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDTs), and a new extension incorporating the LAVA step into GBDTs (LAVABOOST). Both LAVA methods incorporate topological information from protein interactions into the decision function. The different models' performance in classifying 28 cancers resulted in F1-scores of 92.6% (RF), 92.0% (LAVASET), 89.3% (LAVABOOST) and 85.7% (GBDT), with no method outperforming all others for individual cancer type prediction. The CLIFI metric enables visualisation of the model's decision-making functions. The resulting CLIFI value distributions indicated heterogeneity in the expression of several proteins (MYH11, ERα, BCL2) across different cancer types (including brain glioma, breast, kidney, thyroid and prostate cancer) aligning with the original raw expression data. In conclusion, we have developed an integrated, directional feature importance metric for multi-class decision tree-based classification models that facilitates interpretable feature importance assessment. The CLIFI metric can be combined with incorporating topological information into the decision functions of models to introduce inductive bias, enhancing interpretability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
Classification of Systems-II
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Classification of Signals
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...

