Narratives in European debate concerning new genomic techniques

Area of Science:

• Agricultural Science
• Sociology of Science
• Communication Studies

Background:

• Agricultural challenges necessitate solutions acceptable to diverse stakeholders.
• European public opinion on agricultural innovations is highly polarized, hindering constructive debate.
• New genomic techniques (NGTs) are central to discussions on sustainable agriculture.

Purpose of the Study:

• To analyze media narratives surrounding new genomic techniques in European agriculture.
• To identify dominant narrative groups and their underlying themes.
• To explore pathways for depolarizing public debate on NGTs.

Main Methods:

• Narrative analysis of media discourse on new genomic techniques.
• Identification and categorization of distinct narrative groups.
• Comparative analysis of shared values and beliefs across narratives.

Main Results:

• Two primary narrative groups emerged: 'precaution-focused' and 'innovation-focused'.
• 'Precaution-focused' narratives emphasize risks and regulation; 'innovation-focused' narratives highlight benefits for sustainable agriculture.
• Despite polarization, common values and beliefs were identified across narrative groups.

Conclusions:

• Polarization in public opinion on NGTs can be addressed by focusing on shared values.
• Moving beyond divisive narratives can facilitate constructive dialogue.
• Identifying common ground can enable new narratives for problem-solving and collective outcomes in sustainable agriculture.