Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2015
Few-time-points time-integrated activity coefficients calculation using non-linear mixed-effects modeling: Proof of
Rizky Mahardhika Subangun1, Deni Hardiansyah1, Raushan Fikr Ilham Ibrahim1
1Medical Physics and Biophysics, Physics Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of few-time-points (FTP) time-integrated activity coefficients (TIACs) in peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using non-linear mixed-effects (NLME) modeling.
Methods:
Biokinetic data of [111In]In-DOTA-TATE in kidneys at T-1 = (2.9 ± 0.6) h, T-2 = (4.6 ± 0.4) h, T-3 = (22.8 ± 1.6) h, T-4 = (46.7 ± 1.7) h, and T-5 = (70.9 ± 1.0) h after injection were obtained from eight patients using planar imaging. The Sum-Of-Exponentials (SOE) function with four parameters was used, which was selected as the best model for the renal biokinetic data of [111In]In-DOTA-TATE. The parameters of the SOE function were fitted to the all-time-point data in the NLME framework to derive reference (rTIACs). FTP fits, which consist of all combinations of time points, are done to calculate the estimated TIACs (eTIACs). The accuracy of the FTP-NLME TIACs calculations was assessed by calculating the relative deviations (RDs) and relative root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) between the eTIACs and rTIACs.
Results:
The lowest (mean ± SD) of RDs for the single-, two-, three-, four-time point FTPs were (0 ± 8) % (T-4), (1 ± 6) % (T-3 and T-4), (3 ± 5) % (T-2, T-3 and T-4), and (0 ± 2) % (T-2, T-3, T-4, and T-5), respectively. The lowest RMSEs for the one-, two-, three-, and four-time point FTPs were 8 % (T-4), 6 % (T-3 and T-4), 5 % (T-2, T-3 and T-4), and 2 % (T-2, T-3, T-4, and T-5), respectively.
Conclusion:
Our results showed that FTP-NLME in an example of [111In]In-DOTA-TATE could lead to a high accuracy of eTIAC across various time points, when incorporating time point T-4 = (46.7 ± 1.7) h.
More Related Videos
06:31Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Published on: August 8, 2019
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020