Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Field Collection and Laboratory Maintenance of Canopy-Forming Giant Kelp to Facilitate Restoration
Published on: June 7, 2024
Insights into Ecological Resettlements and Conservation-led Displacements: A Systematic Review.
Hari Prasad Pandey1,2,3, Tek Narayan Maraseni4,5,6, Armando Apan4,7,8
1Institute of Life Sciences and the Environment (ILSE), University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia. Hari.Pandey@usq.edu.au.
This study pioneers a systematic review of ecological resettlements and conservation-led displacements (ER), revealing key research trends, methods, and governance issues. Findings highlight prevalent human-centric research and significant equity and justice concerns in conservation practices.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Social Sciences
- Conservation Biology
- Human Ecology
Background:
- Ecological resettlement (ER) and conservation-led displacement practices have historical roots but lack systematic review.
- Existing research on ER is fragmented, necessitating a comprehensive synthesis to guide future conservation strategies and policy.
- The study addresses the critical gap in understanding the global landscape of ER research, its methodologies, and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct the first systematic literature review on ecological resettlements and conservation-led displacements (ER).
- To analyze publication trends, geographical distribution, methodological approaches, and thematic focuses of ER research.
- To identify governance and equity indicators within ER studies and propose future research and conservation strategies.
Main Methods:
- A two-stage systematic literature review was conducted, including a review of reviews and empirical articles from Web of Science and Scopus.
- Data from 164 research articles were extracted and analyzed following PRISMA-P protocols.
- The analysis focused on publication trends, geographical spread, methodologies, data types, thematic content, and governance/equity indicators.
Main Results:
- No prior systematic reviews on ER were found, confirming the pioneering nature of this study.
- Empirical research on ER began in 2001, with publications spread across 108 journals and involving authors/cases from numerous countries.
- Research predominantly focused on human-centric aspects (livelihoods, culture), with frequent reports of governance challenges (informed consent, human rights) and social inequalities, despite addressing 96 communities across 12 ecosystem types.
Conclusions:
- ER research is multidisciplinary and global, but often overlooks institutional aspects and focuses heavily on human impacts.
- Significant governance and equity concerns, including human rights violations, are prevalent in conservation-led displacement.
- Future research and conservation strategies must adopt a pluralistic, equity-focused approach to ensure coexistence between humans and ecosystems in the Anthropocene.
More Related Videos
04:41A Simple Planting Technique for Re-establishing Trees Where Frequent Inundation Occurs
Published on: January 26, 2018
12:26Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
Published on: October 11, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Ecological Disturbance
Ecological Succession
Habitat Fragmentation
Conservation of Declining Populations
Migration
What is Conservation Biology?