Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

Focus Charting, also known as the focus charting system or "focus documentation," is a systematic documentation approach used in healthcare to organize patient information in medical records.
It typically involves three columns for recording information:

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

Types of Selection

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

Dihybrid Crosses

Dihybrid Crosses

Proofreading

Proofreading

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Overlooked considerations in prescribing green and blue infrastructure solutions for urban environments.

Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.))·2026

Same author

Integrating social welfare and conservation: Improvements in multidimensional poverty index outcomes from ecological resettlements in Nepal.

iScience·2026

Same author

How renewable energy policies cut greenhouse gas emissions: Insights from advanced data analysis techniques.

Journal of environmental management·2025

Same author

Insights into Ecological Resettlements and Conservation-led Displacements: A Systematic Review.

Environmental management·2024

Same author

Spatiotemporal analysis of the food-related carbon emissions of China: Regional heterogeneity and the urban‒rural divide.

Journal of environmental management·2024

Same author

Unlocking the tapestry of conservation: Navigating ecological resettlement policies in Nepal.

The Science of the total environment·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Enhancing systematic literature review adapting 'double diamond approach'.

Hari Prasad Pandey^1,2,3, Tek Narayan Maraseni^2,3,4, Armando A Apan^2,5,6

¹Department of Forests and Soil Conservation, Ministry of Forests and Environment, Kathmandu, Nepal.

|December 9, 2024

Summary

This study enhances systematic literature review (SLR) methods by introducing a

Keywords:

Literature searching Research bias Systematic review Two-stage process

More Related Videos

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Area of Science:

Research Methodology
Information Science

Background:

Current literature review frameworks often lack quantification and guidance, potentially introducing bias.
This undermines the validity and reliability of systematic literature reviews (SLRs).

Purpose of the Study:

To enhance existing systematic literature review (SLR) methods.
To address challenges in literature volume quantification, keyword inclusion, knowledge gap identification, and research question formulation.

Main Methods:

Proposes an enhanced SLR method termed 'double-stage SLR', inspired by the Double Diamond Approach (DDA).
Involves a two-stage process: reviewing existing reviews, then reviewing empirical literature.
Systematically reviews both review and empirical literature to optimize review quality.

Main Results:

The 'double-stage SLR' method is designed to identify gaps and define research questions more effectively.
This enhanced approach reduces risks and bias in systematic literature reviews (SLRs).
Practical application validated the effectiveness of the enhanced method.

Conclusions:

The 'double-stage SLR' method builds upon existing frameworks to improve review quality.
Encourages the adoption of this enhanced method for high-quality research outputs.
Optimizes systematic literature review (SLR) processes for greater reliability and validity.