Utilization of double contrast-enhancement boost for lower-extremity CT angiography

We aimed to compare the efficacy of the double contrast enhancement (CE)-boost technique with that of conventional methods to improve vascular contrast attenuation in lower-extremity computed tomography (CT) angiography.

This retrospective study enrolled 45 patients (mean age, 70 years; range, 26 to 90 years; 30 males). To generate the CE-boost image, the degree of CE was determined by subtracting the post-contrast CT images from the pre-contrast CT images. The double CE-boost technique involves the application of this CE process twice. Both objective assessments (CT attenuation, noise level, signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR], and image sharpness) and subjective quality evaluations were conducted on three types of images (conventional, CE-boost, and double CE-boost images).

Double CE-boost images demonstrated significantly reduced noise in Hounsfield units (HUs) compared with conventional and CE-boost images ( $p<0.001$ ). CT attenuation values (HUs) were substantially higher in all different locations of the lower extremity with double CE-boost images ( $834.49\pm 140.73$ ), as opposed to conventional ( $399.63\pm 62.01$ ) and CE-boost images ( $572.66\pm 93.61$ ). The SNR and CNR were notably improved in the double CE-boost image compared with both conventional and CE-boost images. Image sharpness analysis of the popliteal artery ( $p=0.828$ ), anterior tibial artery ( $p=0.671$ ), and dorsalis pedis artery ( $p=0.281$ ) revealed consistency across conventional, CE-boost, and double CE-boost images. Subjective image analysis indicated superior ratings for the double CE-boost compared with other types.

The implementation of the double CE-boost technique improves image quality by decreasing image noise, increasing CT attenuation, and improving SNR, CNR, and subjective assessment compared with CE-boost and conventional imaging.