Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: August 18, 2016
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Current Knowledge, Research Gaps, and Innovative Research Initiatives: JACC
Daniela Crousillat1, Amy Sarma2, Malissa Wood3
1Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa General Hospital Heart and Vascular Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) diagnosis is improving, but its causes and treatments remain unclear. New strategies like patient advocacy and research registries are proposed to advance SCAD knowledge and care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Medical Research
Background:
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) recognition has increased, yet understanding of its pathophysiology, triggers, and management is limited.
- Significant knowledge gaps persist regarding the fundamental mechanisms and contributing factors of SCAD.
- Current clinical care and research for SCAD face challenges in addressing these knowledge deficits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify critical research gaps in spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD).
- To propose strategies for improving SCAD clinical care, research, and patient outcomes.
- To introduce a novel patient-centered framework for SCAD research and clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and analysis of current SCAD research landscape.
- Identification of key areas requiring further investigation.
- Description of a proposed patient-centered clinical care and research framework.
Main Results:
- Significant gaps exist in understanding SCAD pathophysiology, etiology, and optimal treatment strategies.
- Patient advocacy, independent registries, and centers of excellence are identified as crucial for progress.
- A new patient-centered framework is presented as a model for advancing SCAD knowledge.
Conclusions:
- Addressing knowledge gaps in SCAD requires a multi-faceted approach.
- Patient engagement and collaborative research initiatives are essential for improving SCAD outcomes.
- The proposed framework offers a model for future SCAD research and clinical advancements.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

