Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Aggregation Bias and Socioeconomic Gradients in Waiting Time for Hospital Admissions
Fredrik Carlsen1, Tor Helge Holmås2, Oddvar Kaarboe3
1Department of Economics, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Aggregate measures of socioeconomic status overestimate healthcare waiting time disparities. Individual-level data reveals more modest socioeconomic gradients in healthcare access, highlighting potential biases in public health research.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Public Health Policy
- Socioeconomic Determinants of Health
Background:
- Waiting times in publicly funded healthcare systems aim for equitable access based on need.
- Existing research indicates socioeconomic status (SES) influences healthcare waiting times, often using aggregated residential data.
- Aggregate SES measures may introduce aggregation bias, potentially skewing findings on healthcare access disparities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the aggregation bias in measuring socioeconomic gradients of healthcare waiting times.
- To compare socioeconomic gradients in waiting times using individual-level versus aggregate-level SES data.
- To assess the impact of different data aggregation levels (individual, population cell, municipal) on estimating SES-based waiting time disparities.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of socioeconomic gradients in healthcare waiting times across three data aggregation levels: individual, population cell, and municipal.
- Measurement of socioeconomic status using education and income data at each respective level.
- Comparison of the magnitude and accuracy of socioeconomic gradients observed at different aggregation levels.
Main Results:
- The socioeconomic gradient in waiting times is modest when SES is measured at the individual level.
- Aggregate-level measurements of SES (population cell and municipal) show stronger associations with waiting times.
- Aggregate data leads to less accurate estimates and risks overstating the magnitude of socioeconomic gradients in healthcare access.
Conclusions:
- Measuring socioeconomic status at an aggregate level can significantly inflate perceived disparities in healthcare waiting times.
- Individual-level data provides a more accurate representation of the relationship between socioeconomic status and healthcare access.
- Researchers must be cautious of aggregation bias when analyzing socioeconomic determinants of health using publicly available data.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
The Availability Heuristic
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Causality in Epidemiology