Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Beta-blockers after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction and non-reduced left
Jun-Chang Jeong1, Jong-Il Park1, Byung-Jun Kim2
1Division of Cardiology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Beta-blocker (BB) treatment did not significantly reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and preserved ejection fraction (LVEF ≥40%) one year after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Limited data exist on the clinical impact of beta-blockers (BBs) in myocardial infarction (MI) patients with non-reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Understanding BB efficacy in this specific patient subgroup is crucial for optimizing post-MI treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of BB treatment in patients with acute MI and preserved LVEF (≥40%) after PCI.
- To determine if BBs reduce patient-oriented composite endpoints (POCEs) at 1-year follow-up in this population.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 12,101 MI patients with LVEF ≥40% from the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry V (2016-2020) was analyzed.
- Patients were categorized into BB (n=9,468) and non-BB (n=2,633) groups based on discharge medication.
- The primary outcome was 1-year incidence of POCEs (all-cause mortality, MI, or revascularization), assessed before and after propensity score matching.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in 1-year POCE incidence was found between the BB and non-BB groups, both before (3.1% vs. 3.4%) and after propensity score matching (3.7% vs. 3.4%).
- Individual components of POCEs, including mortality, MI, and revascularization, also showed no significant differences between groups.
- Age, chronic kidney disease, reduced LVEF, and multivessel disease were identified as independent predictors of 1-year POCEs.
Conclusions:
- Beta-blocker treatment in acute MI patients with non-reduced LVEF was not associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular outcomes at 1-year follow-up.
- Further research may be needed to identify specific patient profiles within this group who might benefit from BB therapy.
Background:
Data on the clinical impact of beta-blockers (BBs) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) who had non-reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after percutaneous coronary intervention are limited.
Methods:
From 2016 to 2020, we evaluated a cohort of 12,101 myocardial infarction patients with a non-reduced LVEF (≥40%) from the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry V. Patients were divided into two groups based on their BB (carvedilol, bisoprolol, or nebivolol) treatment at discharge: with beta-blocker treatment (BB, n = 9,468) and without beta-blocker treatment (non-BB, n = 2,633). The primary endpoint after discharge was the occurrence of patient-oriented composite endpoints (POCEs), including all-cause mortality, any MI, or any revascularization at 1-year follow-up.
Results:
The median follow-up period was 353 days (interquartile range, 198-378 days). At 1-year follow-up, no significant differences were observed in the primary endpoint between the BB group and the non-BB group. Before propensity score (PS) matching, the POCE incidence was 3.1% in the BB group vs. 3.4% in the non-BB group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-1.09, p = 0.225]. After PS matching, the POCE incidence remained similar between the two groups (3.7% vs. 3.4%, HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.76-1.35, p = 0.931). Individual outcomes, including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and revascularization, also showed no significant differences between the two groups. Independent predictors of 1-year POCEs after discharge were age, chronic kidney disease, reduced LVEF, and multivessel disease.
Conclusion:
BB treatment in patients with acute MI and non-reduced LVEF was not associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular outcomes at 1-year follow-up.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions of β-Receptor Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of β-Receptor Blockers
Antianginal Drugs: Nitrates and β-Blockers
Organic nitrates, such as nitroglycerin, play a pivotal role. Once metabolized, they liberate nitric oxide, a molecular marvel. Nitric oxide triggers guanylyl cyclase and augments cGMP production. This biochemical cascade orchestrates the relaxation of vascular smooth muscles, ushering in vasodilation and enhancing coronary blood flow....
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers