Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

07:48
Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
Published on: April 4, 2025
179
Open Source, Open Science: Development of OpenLESS as the Automated Landing Error Scoring System
Medrxiv : the Preprint Server for Health Sciences
|December 9, 2024
Summary
The Open Landing Error Scoring System (OpenLESS) automates jump-landing analysis using markerless motion capture. This novel tool demonstrates good validity and excellent reliability for assessing lower extremity movement quality in clinical settings.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Movement Science
- Clinical Assessment
Background:
- Assessing lower extremity movement quality during jump-landing is crucial for injury prevention and rehabilitation.
- Current methods like the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) are time-consuming and require manual scoring.
- There is a need for automated, efficient tools to analyze functional movement in clinical settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate the Open Landing Error Scoring System (OpenLESS), an open-source, markerless motion capture tool.
- To assess the validity of OpenLESS against expert LESS scores in healthy and post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) populations.
- To evaluate the intersession reliability of OpenLESS in an athlete cohort.
Main Methods:
- Developed OpenLESS software to automatically score jump-landing movement quality from 3D kinematics.
- Collected data from 92 participants across healthy, post-ACLR, and amateur athlete cohorts.
- Assessed validity using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) against expert LESS scores and reliability across four time points.
Main Results:
- OpenLESS demonstrated good agreement with expert LESS scores in healthy (ICC=0.79) and post-ACLR (ICC=0.88) cohorts.
- Automated scoring significantly reduced analysis time compared to manual scoring (under 15 minutes vs. 18.5 hours).
- Excellent intersession reliability was observed (ICC > 0.89) with a SEM of 0.98 errors and MDC of 2.72 errors.
Conclusions:
- OpenLESS is a promising, efficient, and automated tool for assessing jump-landing quality.
- The system shows good validity against expert raters and excellent reliability in field settings.
- OpenLESS addresses the need for objective and timely movement analysis in clinical practice and research.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
5.6K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
5.6K
Errors in Global Positioning System
36
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
36
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
1.4K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.4K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
60
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
60
Random and Systematic Errors
10.8K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.8K
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
50
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
50

