Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

301
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
301
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

202
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
202
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

328
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
328
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

90
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
90
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

204
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
204

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-Guideline-Compliant Prescriptions of Benzodiazepines and Z Drugs: Effects of Social Norm Feedback. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026
Same author

Communicating Time-to-Event Treatment Effects in Randomized Trials: A Randomized Experiment among General Practitioners.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

Translating predictive models into clinical practice: fast-and-frugal trees for postoperative delirium using routine data.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Short report: association between self-reported COVID-19 experience and contemptuous beliefs about pandemic management among German citizens and healthcare professionals.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Comparison of the novel simultaneous biplane versus in-plane imaging technique in ultrasound-guided biopsy: a prospective randomized multi-operator cross-over phantom study.

Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)·2025
Same author

A social network perspective on social cues for COVID risk perception.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
06:39

Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements

Published on: August 28, 2017

14.2K

The Evidence Effect: How Fact Boxes Shift Perceptions of Lung Cancer Screening in Austrian Medical Practice.

Carolina Amelunxen1,2, Michel Bielecki3, Odette Wegwarth4,5

  • 1Karl Landsteiner Institut für Lungenforschung und Pneumologische Onkologie, Vienna, Austria.

Cancer Medicine
|December 9, 2024
PubMed
Summary

A fact box intervention significantly improved physicians' understanding of lung cancer screening benefits and harms, enhancing their ability to provide patient-centered advice and potentially increasing screening adherence.

Keywords:
fact boxicon arrayphysician educationscreening

More Related Videos

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.3K
Use of Electromagnetic Navigational Transthoracic Needle Aspiration E-TTNA for Sampling of Lung Nodules
06:03

Use of Electromagnetic Navigational Transthoracic Needle Aspiration E-TTNA for Sampling of Lung Nodules

Published on: May 23, 2015

22.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
06:39

Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements

Published on: August 28, 2017

14.2K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.3K
Use of Electromagnetic Navigational Transthoracic Needle Aspiration E-TTNA for Sampling of Lung Nodules
06:03

Use of Electromagnetic Navigational Transthoracic Needle Aspiration E-TTNA for Sampling of Lung Nodules

Published on: May 23, 2015

22.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Public Health
  • Health Communication

Background:

  • Recent lung cancer screening studies have reignited discussions on the benefit-to-harm balance.
  • Physician comprehension of lung cancer screening's risks and benefits is crucial for effective implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess Austrian physicians' understanding of lung cancer screening's advantages and risks.
  • To evaluate the impact of educational data visualization tools (fact box, icon array) on physician comprehension.

Main Methods:

  • A survey of 136 Austrian physicians was conducted before and after exposure to educational tools.
  • Participants were divided into groups receiving a fact box alone or a fact box combined with an icon array.
  • Online survey assessed perception and understanding of lung cancer screening risks and benefits.

Main Results:

  • The fact box significantly improved physicians' understanding of lung cancer screening benefits and harms.
  • Physicians exposed to the fact box were up to 13 times more likely to adjust risk/benefit estimates.
  • The intervention was particularly effective for physicians who initially did not recommend screening; the icon array showed no additional benefit.

Conclusions:

  • Educational data visualization, specifically fact boxes, can enhance physician understanding of complex screening information.
  • Improved comprehension may lead to better patient-centered advice and adherence to lung cancer screening protocols.
  • Further research in diverse settings is needed to confirm real-world clinical impact.