Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Trans-vivo Delayed Type Hypersensitivity Assay for Antigen Specific Regulation
Published on: May 2, 2013
Treatment With mTOR Inhibitors as Primary Immunosuppression After Combined Heart and Kidney Transplantation
Hilmi Alnsasra1, Rabea Asleh2, Fouad Khalil3
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases and Health Sciences Research and the William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, Israel; Department of Cardiology, Soroka University Medical Center, Beersheva, Israel.
Introduction:
Sirolimus (SRL) mitigates cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) progression and confers renal protection after heart transplantation (HT). However, its safety and efficacy in patients undergoing combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKT) are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to SRL on CAV progression, renal function, and outcomes in HKT compared with isolated HT.
Methods:
A cohort of 302 patients who underwent either HT only (n = 262) or HKT (n = 40) was analyzed. CAV progression was assessed by measuring the delta (Δ) annual change in plaque volume (PV) and plaque index (PI) using coronary intravenous ultrasound (IVUS). Clinical adverse outcomes included all-cause death and CAV-associated events. Overall, 217 (72%) patients were converted from CNI to SRL as primary immunosuppression. HT recipients were more likely to be converted to SRL than HKT recipients (74% vs. 55%, P = .01).
Results:
HKT was associated with higher Δ PV (P = .01) and a trend toward higher ΔPI (P = .06) than HT only, but this association was attenuated after adjustment to SRL conversion. HKT was associated with similar risk of death (HR, 0.98; 95% CI 0.39-2.5, P = 0.97) and CAV-related events (HR, 1.6; 95% CI 0.91-2.8, P = .10). Conversion to SRL was associated with decreased risk of death and CAV-related events in the overall cohort. This association was not modified by the type of organ transplantation and without a significant effect on estimated glomerular filtration rate or proteinuria.
Conclusion:
Conversion to sirolimus as a primary immunosuppressant could be effective for either HT-only or HKT recipients.
Insights
Converting to sirolimus (SRL) after heart or combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKT) effectively reduces death and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) events. This immunosuppression strategy benefits both heart-only and HKT recipients.
Area of Science:
- Immunosuppression strategies in organ transplantation
- Cardiovascular research
- Nephrology and renal function
Background:
- Sirolimus (SRL) is known to mitigate cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and protect renal function post-heart transplantation (HT).
- The efficacy and safety of SRL in combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKT) remain under investigation.
- Understanding SRL's impact in HKT versus HT-only is crucial for optimizing immunosuppressive protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of converting from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to SRL on CAV progression.
- To assess renal function and clinical outcomes in HKT recipients compared to HT-only recipients.
- To determine the safety and efficacy of SRL as a primary immunosuppressant in HKT versus HT.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 302 patients (262 HT, 40 HKT) was analyzed.
- CAV progression was assessed using coronary intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to measure changes in plaque volume (PV) and plaque index (PI).
- Patients were converted from CNIs to SRL, with outcomes including death and CAV-related events.
Main Results:
- HKT showed higher plaque volume progression than HT-only, but this was attenuated by SRL conversion.
- Conversion to SRL was associated with a reduced risk of death and CAV-related events in the overall cohort.
- SRL conversion did not significantly impact estimated glomerular filtration rate or proteinuria and showed similar benefits across HT and HKT groups.
Conclusions:
- Conversion to sirolimus as a primary immunosuppressant is effective for both HT-only and HKT recipients.
- SRL demonstrates a favorable safety and efficacy profile in managing CAV and improving outcomes in combined transplantation.
- The study supports the use of SRL in HKT protocols to mitigate CAV progression and reduce adverse clinical events.
Related Concept Videos
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Tumor Immunotherapy
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...

