Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

06:28
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
8.3K
Utilizing Quality Improvement Methodology to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Between Faculty and
Kevin Tang1, Sabrina Layne2, Sarju Panchal2
1Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. kevin.tang@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Journal of General Internal Medicine
|December 9, 2024
Summary
A quality improvement initiative reduced colorectal cancer (CRC) screening disparities between resident and faculty patient panels. An interprofessional panel management protocol improved CRC screening rates in resident panels by 29%.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Quality Improvement Science
- Oncology
Background:
- Health system data indicated a 14% disparity in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates between resident and faculty patient panels.
- This disparity suggests potential barriers to CRC screening within resident-led primary care settings.
- Addressing these disparities is crucial for equitable cancer prevention and early detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify causes for CRC screening disparities in resident patient panels.
- To implement and evaluate an innovative, resident-led quality improvement (QI) intervention to reduce these disparities.
- To assess the impact of an interprofessional panel management protocol on CRC screening rates.
Main Methods:
- A quality improvement project was conducted across two academic primary care clinics.
- Residents engaged stakeholders to identify causes for CRC screening disparities and potential solutions.
- A novel interprofessional panel management protocol was implemented to guide population health strategies and streamline navigation for CRC screening.
Main Results:
- After four months, CRC screening rates in resident panels improved from 62% to 68%.
- The disparity in CRC screening between faculty and resident panels decreased from 14% to 10%, a 29% reduction.
- The interprofessional panel management protocol demonstrated significant effectiveness in increasing CRC screening rates.
Conclusions:
- An interprofessional panel management protocol effectively increased CRC screening rates in resident primary care panels.
- This intervention successfully reduced disparities in CRC screening, highlighting the importance of multipronged approaches.
- QI initiatives and panel management strategies are vital for improving cancer screening equity and outcomes.
Keywords:
disparitiesimplementationintervention and evaluation designs and methodsintervention resultsquality improvementMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
559
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
For example, a patient with a chronic...
559
Preventive Healthcare Services
967
Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:
967
Ethical Issues
852
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
852

