Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

03:14
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
502
Large language model usage guidelines in Korean medical journals: a survey using human-artificial intelligence
Sangzin Ahn1,2
1Department of Pharmacology and PharmacoGenomics Research Center, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
|December 11, 2024
Summary
Korean medical journals show increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) guidelines, with most prohibiting AI authorship and requiring disclosure of AI tool use. Standardization is needed for responsible AI integration in research.
Area of Science:
- Medical publishing
- Artificial intelligence in research
- Academic ethics
Background:
- Large language models (LLMs) present ethical and practical challenges in academic publishing.
- This study investigates the current state of AI guidelines in Korean medical journals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the prevalence and content of AI guidelines in Korean medical journals.
- To inform future policy development for responsible AI use.
Main Methods:
- Surveyed the top 100 Korean medical journals based on the Hirsh index.
- Analyzed author guidelines for AI-related content using human and AI screening.
- Extracted and compared key components of LLM policies and analyzed journal characteristics.
Main Results:
- Only 18% of journals had LLM guidelines, but adoption rose to 57.1% by Q1 2024.
- High-impact journals were more likely to adopt AI guidelines.
- Policies mandated AI tool disclosure, prohibited AI authorship, emphasized human responsibility, and discouraged AI-generated content.
Conclusions:
- LLM guideline adoption in Korean medical journals lags behind international trends but is increasing.
- Existing guidelines align with international standards regarding AI authorship and disclosure.
- Greater standardization and collaboration are essential for ethical AI implementation in medical research.
Keywords:
Artificial intelligenceMedical writingResearch ethicsScholarly communicationScientific misconduct
