Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Results of a Digital Multimodal Motivational and Educational Program as Follow-Up Care for Former Cardiac
Maxi Pia Bretschneider1, Wolfgang Mayer-Berger2, Jens Weine3
1Department for Prevention and Care of Diabetes, Department of Medicine III, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany, 49 351 458 2715.
Background:
Digital interventions are promising additions for both usual care and rehabilitation. Evidence and studies for the latter, however, are still rare.
Objective:
The aim of the study was to examine the app/web-based patient education program called "mebix" (previously called "Vision 2 - Gesundes Herz") regarding its effectiveness in relation to the parameters of disease-specific quality of life (HeartQoL), cardiovascular risk profile (Cardiovascular Risk Management [CARRISMA]), and prognostic estimation of early retirement (Screening instrument work and occupation [SIBAR]) in 190 participants from a cardiological rehabilitation clinic.
Methods:
To evaluate mebix, 354 patients from the Roderbirken Clinic of the German Pension Insurance Rhineland (Germany) with a coronary heart diesase were recruited and randomized either to the intervention group (using mebix postrehabiliation for up to 12 months) or the control group (receiving standard care). The data collection took place at the end of inpatient rehabilitation (t0), as well as 6 months (t1) and 12 months (t2) after the end of rehabilitation. Analyses of variance are used to assess the overall significance of difference in outcome parameters between groups and over time.
Results:
The primary endpoint of disease-related quality of life shows a significant improvement of 7.35 points over the course of the intervention that is also more pronounced in the intervention group. Similarly, the 10-year risk of cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction showed significant improvements in the cardiovascular risk profile over time and between groups, indicating better results in the intervention group (ie, a reduction of -1.59 and -5.03, respectively). Secondary outcomes like the body weight and cholesterol levels were significantly reduced in the intervention group, also in comparison with the control group. In addition, the SIBAR was significantly lower/better at the end of the observation period than at the beginning of the observation for both groups.
Conclusions:
Overall, the digital training program represents an effective follow-up offer after rehabilitation that could be incorporated into standard care to further improve disease-related quality of life and cardiovascular risk profiles.
Related Concept Videos
Restorative Care
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management

