Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Predicting In Vivo Payloads Delivery using a Blood-brain Tumor-barrier in a Dish
Published on: April 16, 2019
An In Vitro-In Vivo Comparative Study Using Highly Sensitive Radioisotopic Assays to Assess the Predictive Power of
Ahmed Refaat1, Patrick Thomas1,2, Weisen Zhang1,3
1Department of Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 381 Royal Parade, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Abstract:
Microfluidic BBB-on-a-chip models (microBBB) aim to recapitulate the organotypic features of the human BBB with great potential to model CNS diseases and advance CNS therapeutics. Nevertheless, their predictive capacity for drug uptake into the brain remains uncertain due to limited evaluation with only a small number of model drugs. Here, the in vivo brain uptake of a panel of nine radiolabeled compounds is evaluated in Swiss-outbred mice following a single intravenously administered dose and compared against results from the microfluidic microBBB platform and the conventional Transwell BBB model. Radioisotopic measurements are employed to calculate brain-to-plasma concentration ratios (B/P) of the compounds both in vivo and in vitro. The in vitro-in vivo correlation plots of the B/P ratios revealed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.8081, R2 = 0.6530) for the microBBB, suggesting a high degree of predictive ability for drug permeability into the brain. In contrast, the Transwell assay showed a weaker in vitro-in vivo correlation (r = 0.6467, R2 = 0.4182). Finally, brain uptake of radiolabeled, brain-targeted, angiopep2-conjugated nanoparticles (ANG2-NP) is assessed in the microBBB and results mirrored the in vivo uptake, while the Transwell model failed to resolve the differences between the targeted and non-targeted NPs.

