Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

6.3K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The AHS-R: A holistic thinking measure with expanded theoretical domains and improved score reliability.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Nourish the mind: protocol for an umbrella review on nutrients and bioactive food components supporting brain health across the lifespan.

Systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Short-Term Effects of a Caregiver-Mediated Intervention for Preschoolers at Risk for Developmental Language Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Effects of age and APOE ϵ4 genotype on the relationship between pulse pressure and executive function in older adults without Dementia.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2026
Same author

Validation of International Cognitive Ability Resource (ICAR) Implemented in Mobile Toolbox (MTB).

Journal of Intelligence·2025
Same author

Age-related differences and commonalities in remembering earliest memories: a comparison of young and older adults.

Memory (Hove, England)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.8K

A comparison of scoring algorithms for the NIH Toolbox executive function tasks in a U.S. norming sample.

Yusuke Shono1, Berivan Ece2, Emily H Ho2

  • 1School of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University.

Psychological Assessment
|December 12, 2024
PubMed
Summary

The study recommends the rate-correct score for executive function (EF) tests, integrating speed and accuracy for more robust results. This method improves scoring accuracy and sensitivity to age-related changes in cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control.

More Related Videos

Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage
06:46

Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage

Published on: August 4, 2018

12.1K
Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

11.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.8K
Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage
06:46

Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage

Published on: August 4, 2018

12.1K
Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

11.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Psychometrics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Executive functions (EF) are crucial for behavioral, clinical, and educational success.
  • Existing scoring methods for EF tasks often focus on speed or accuracy separately, lacking a comprehensive approach.
  • There is a need for validated, norm-referenced scoring methods for EF assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically evaluate and compare various scoring algorithms for executive function (EF) tests.
  • To determine the most effective method for integrating speed and accuracy into a single, reliable score for EF tasks.
  • To establish norm-referenced scores for the NIH Toolbox Version 3 (NIHTB V3) executive function measures.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from a large, diverse U.S. population sample (N = 3,794, ages 3-85) for the NIH Toolbox Version 3 (NIHTB V3) norming study.
  • Compared multiple scoring algorithms, including joint speed-accuracy integration methods (rate-correct, linear integrated, additive) against single-index scores.
  • Administered and analyzed data from the Dimensional Change Card Sort and Flanker tests, two key EF measures.

Main Results:

  • Joint scoring algorithms, particularly the rate-correct score, demonstrated superior psychometric properties compared to accuracy or speed alone.
  • Integrated speed-accuracy scores showed consistency, stability across tasks and time, and appropriate age-related performance trajectories.
  • The rate-correct score exhibited minimal ceiling effects and high sensitivity to age-related EF variability, supporting its use for norming.

Conclusions:

  • The rate-correct score is recommended for scoring executive function tests due to its robust psychometric evidence and sensitivity.
  • This scoring method provides a reliable basis for generating new norm-referenced scores for the NIHTB V3 EF measures.
  • The findings support the use of integrated speed-accuracy scoring for improved assessment of cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control across the lifespan.