Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Cerebellar perturbation impairs human working memory and degrades spatial tuning throughout cortex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Striatal Dopamine Actions and Movement: Inferences from Parkinson Disease.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025

Same author

Dissociable Causal Roles of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Primary Motor Cortex over the Course of Motor Skill Development.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025

Same author

Publisher Correction: Errors of attention adaptively warp spatial cognition.

Nature human behaviour·2025

Same author

Errors of attention adaptively warp spatial cognition.

Nature human behaviour·2025

Same author

The temporal dynamics of visual attention.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

The forced-response method: A new chronometric approach to measure conflict processing.

Taraz G Lee¹, Jacob Sellers², John Jonides²

¹Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. tarazlee@umich.edu.

Behavior Research Methods

|December 12, 2024

Summary

The forced-response method offers a novel way to study conflict resolution by fixing response time. This technique reveals detailed conflict processing dynamics, similar to traditional free reaction time (RT) tasks.

Keywords:

Conflict processing Conflict resolution Response conflict Response signal Speed–accuracy trade-off

More Related Videos

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Human Behavior

Background:

Free reaction times (RTs) are commonly used to measure conflict resolution in cognitive psychology.
Concerns exist regarding the limitations of free RTs in fully capturing speed-accuracy trade-offs.
Existing methods may not fully reveal the temporal dynamics of cognitive conflict.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce and validate the forced-response method for examining speed-accuracy trade-off functions (SATs) in conflict tasks.
To provide a more nuanced understanding of conflict resolution dynamics.
To explore the time course of cognitive processing in conflict resolution.

Main Methods:

The forced-response method involves fixing overall response time while varying stimulus onset.
Response expression is observed to infer cognitive processing.
Applied to an arrow flanker task to analyze interference effects.

Main Results:

A comprehensive time course of the flanker interference effect was revealed, offering insights rarely seen in prior research.
Accuracy was affected by manipulations in a manner consistent with free-RT paradigms.
The forced-response method demonstrated its ability to capture core cognitive processing characteristics.

Conclusions:

The forced-response method is a viable alternative to free RTs for studying conflict resolution.
This technique provides a more detailed examination of the temporal dynamics of cognitive conflict.
It offers a novel behavioral approach to understanding the nuances of conflict resolution processes.