Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Clinical Trials: Incomplete Data and FDA-Approved Devices
Deborah Furman1, Brian Whisenant2
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Insights
Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions significantly improve quality of life and right ventricular function. These procedures offer meaningful benefits for patients with heart failure, with specific device choices depending on individual patient anatomy and risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) significantly impacts quality of life and prognosis in heart failure patients.
- Transcatheter tricuspid valve (TTV) interventions offer a less invasive treatment option for symptomatic patients.
- Assessing meaningful clinical benefit and appropriate patient selection are crucial for TTV therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical meaningfulness of transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions.
- To compare the outcomes of transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (TEER) and transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR).
- To identify optimal patient characteristics and selection criteria for different TTV approaches.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical trial data, including TRILUMINATE (TEER) and TRISCEND II (TTVR).
- Assessment of quality of life using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ).
- Evaluation of right ventricular remodeling and TR reduction as key endpoints.
Main Results:
- Both TEER and TTVR demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in KCCQ scores and favorable right ventricular remodeling.
- TRISCEND II (EVOQUE TTVR) showed a higher rate of TR reduction to mild or less (94%) compared to TRILUMINATE (TriClip TEER) (50%).
- The higher-risk TRISCEND II population and near-elimination of TR with EVOQUE correlated with favorable mortality trends.
Conclusions:
- Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions provide significant quality of life and functional benefits for patients with severe TR.
- KCCQ score changes serve as a meaningful surrogate endpoint for TTV interventions.
- Patient selection should consider coaptation gap size, pacemaker lead impingement, and tolerance for anticoagulation to guide the choice between TEER and TTVR.
Abstract:
Each reviewed trial of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)-defined quality of life and favorable right ventricular remodeling. KCCQ correlates with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) reduction, heart failure hospitalization, and mortality. Change in KCCQ is therefore meaningful both as a measure of quality of life and as a surrogate endpoint of the impact of TV interventions. TRILUMINATE, the first randomized trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tricuspid edge-to-edge repair, demonstrated clinically important benefits in KCCQ score and favorable right ventricular remodeling, which are appropriate endpoints for this symptomatic population. TRISCEND II, which evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the EVOQUE valve, enrolled patients with more New York Heart Association class III and IV heart failure and lower KCCQ scores than TRILUMINATE. EVOQUE tricuspid valve replacement in TRISCEND II reduced TR to mild or less in 94% of patients compared to 50% of patients treated with TriClip in TRILUMINATE. The higher-risk TRISCEND II population and the near elimination of TR with EVOQUE are consistent with the favorable trend in EVOQUE mortality. Patients with diminished left ventricular systolic function being considered for either of these tricuspid valve interventions should be optimized with guideline directed medical therapy. Significant left-side valve disease should be treated. Patients should be optimally diuresed and excluded with severe pulmonary hypertension. Patients with persistent severe TR and symptoms or right ventricular enlargement should be considered for intervention. Smaller coaptation gaps without significant pacemaker impingement may be well served with transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair, while larger coaptation gaps and leaflets pinned by right ventricular leads, particularly in patients tolerating oral anticoagulation, may be best served with transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement.
More Related Videos
09:57Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Guided Valve Sizing for Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Published on: January 20, 2022
05:31Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement from Autologous Pericardium with a Self-Expandable Nitinol Stent in an Adult Sheep Model
Published on: June 8, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management