Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Association of atrial fibrillation with lamotrigine: An observational cohort study
Sodam Kim1, Landon Welch2, Bertha De Los Santos1
1Department of Pharmacy Systems and Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Background:
Drug-induced atrial fibrillation (AF) is recognized as an important causal association. Lamotrigine (LTG) is a widely prescribed neurological agent with Class IB antiarrhythmic properties at therapeutically relevant concentrations. The United States Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning for a higher risk of LTG proarrhythmic events in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and/or myocardial ischemia. This study evaluated the incidence of AF with LTG use.
Methods:
A retrospective observational study was performed using a large healthcare claims database of adult participants analyzing 2 years AF incidence. The analytic cohort included adult participants with bipolar I disorder (BPD), partial seizures (PSZ), or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTSZ). Exposure to LTG was compared with commonly prescribed alternative agents as the control comparators (CTR). Participants were free from supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias during the 6 months baseline period prior to the index LTG or CTR date. Kaplan-Meier estimator calculated 2 years cumulative AF incidence, with participants censored at last enrollment, treatment switching, or discontinuation. The AF association hazard ratios (HR) for LTG versus CTR were adjusted for baseline characteristics.
Results:
The analytic cohort with BPD, PSZ, and GTSZ consisted, respectively, of 150,470 LTG versus 204,704 CTR, 9565 LTG versus 21,595 CTR, and 5505 LTG versus 15,513 CTR patients. In a predominantly middle-aged female population at baseline, the prevalence of cardiovascular conditions was low. The 12 months cumulative incidence of AF for LTG versus CTR was 0.764% versus 0.642% among BPD, 0.833% versus 0.646% among PSZ, and 0.585% versus 0.338% among GTSZ, respectively. The adjusted 365-day HR [95% confidence interval CI] of AF for LTG versus CTR in the BPD, PSZ, and CTSZ groups was 1.257 [1.088-1.453], 1.651 [1.104-2.468], and 1.451 [0.770-2.734], respectively.
Conclusions:
In adult AF-naïve participants, LTG has a strong association with increased AF risk compared with commonly prescribed alternatives.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Arteries of the Lower Limbs
Various factors can trigger epilepsy, including genetic factors, brain damage, metabolic causes, and unknown etiology. Diagnosis of epilepsy involves electroencephalography (EEG), which...

