Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Meta-Analysis of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Endovascular Treatment in Lower Extremity
Jae-Sik Jang1, Han-Young Jin1, Young-Ah Park1
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea.
Abstract:
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) offers precise information about lesion morphology and enhances the optimization of endovascular treatments (EVT). Nevertheless, the impact of IVUS on the durability of EVTs and clinical outcomes remains uncertain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of IVUS-guided EVT compared with angiography-guided EVT. We conducted a meta-analysis of trials comparing IVUS-guided and angiography-guided EVT. The primary end point was binary restenosis, whereas the secondary end points included reintervention, major amputation, death or amputation, and major adverse limb events (MALE). This meta-analysis included 19 studies with 800,452 patients. Compared with angiography-guided EVT, IVUS-guided EVT significantly reduced the risk of binary restenosis (risk ratio [RR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 0.91, p = 0.02). It also reduced the risk of reintervention (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.90, p = 0.01), major amputation (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.98, p = 0.02), death or amputation (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.91, p = 0.007), and MALE (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.94, p = 0.03). Subgroup analysis for femoropopliteal disease revealed consistent benefits of IVUS guidance regarding binary restenosis (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.94, p = 0.03), reintervention (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.80, p = 0.003), major amputation (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99, p = 0.04), death or amputation (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.90, p = 0.007), and MALE (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96, p = 0.04). The sensitivity analysis of studies using drug-coated devices also showed the consistent benefit of IVUS guidance regarding binary restenosis. In conclusion, compared with angiography, IVUS-guided EVT provided improved clinical outcomes in terms of binary restenosis, reintervention, major amputation, death or amputation, and MALE in lower extremity artery disease, including femoropopliteal disease.
More Related Videos
00:09Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
Published on: November 19, 2019
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care