Early experience managing intravascular coagulum using polidocanol endovenous microfoam: Risk factor analysis

Mariam Mesa-Damiano1, Francisco J Melesio1, Jailenne I Quiñones-Rodriguez1

  • 1Department of Clinical Anatomy, Sam Houston State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Conroe, TX, USA.

Phlebology
|December 16, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Lower injection volumes of polidocanol endovenous microfoam (PEM) are linked to a higher risk of developing intravascular coagulum (IC). Further research is needed to determine optimal PEM injection volumes for vein treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Phlebology
  • Medical Device Research

Background:

  • Intravascular coagulum (IC) is an observed complication in clinical practice following polidocanol endovenous microfoam (PEM) treatment for chronic venous insufficiency.
  • Identifying risk factors for IC is crucial for improving patient outcomes and treatment protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate potential risk factors associated with the development of intravascular coagulum (IC) after polidocanol endovenous microfoam (PEM) treatment.
  • To analyze patient demographics, comorbidities, and ultrasound findings in relation to IC incidence.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective cohort study of 119 patients treated with PEM for chronic venous insufficiency.
  • Patients were stratified into IC (n=16) and non-IC (n=103) groups based on clinical presentation and ultrasound-confirmed coagulum aspiration.
  • Demographic data, comorbidities, and duplex ultrasound reports were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Overall, 13% of patients developed IC, with a mean onset time of 45 days post-ablation.
  • Univariate analysis indicated lower PEM injection volumes, high great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux, and Latino ethnicity as potential risk factors.
  • Multivariate analysis confirmed lower PEM injection volumes as the sole significant risk factor for IC development (p=0.006).

Conclusions:

  • Lower polidocanol endovenous microfoam injection volumes represent a significant risk factor for intravascular coagulum formation.
  • Further studies are warranted to establish ideal injection volumes per treated venous segment to mitigate IC risk.

Related Concept Videos