Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Published on: August 6, 2019
Conventional Radiotherapy Timing and Wound Complication Avoidance After Surgery for Metastatic Spine Disease. A LatAm
Federico Landriel1, Kevin White2, Fernando Padilla Lichtenberger1
1Neurosurgical Department, Spine Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Spinal surgeons reached consensus on radiotherapy timing and risks after surgery for spinal metastases. Key factors influencing wound complications include nutrition, surgical approach, and spinal location.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Neurosurgery
- Radiation Oncology
Background:
- Surgery and radiotherapy are standard for spinal metastases requiring stabilization or decompression.
- Optimal timing of radiotherapy post-surgery is critical for balancing treatment effectiveness and minimizing wound complications.
- This study explored Latin American spinal surgeons' consensus on conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) after spinal surgery for metastases, focusing on wound complication risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify consensus and non-consensus areas among Latin American spinal surgeons regarding cEBRT use, timing, risks, and surgical approach post-metastasis surgery.
- Specifically focused on understanding the risk of radiotherapy-related wound complications.
Main Methods:
- A modified Delphi survey methodology was employed.
- The expert panel comprised active members of AOSpine Latin America with significant experience in vertebral metastasis surgery.
- The survey included 37 statements, with consensus levels defined as weak (70-79.9%), moderate (80-89.9%), and strong (≥90%).
Main Results:
- Consensus (≥70%) was achieved on 32 out of 37 statements (86.5%).
- Strong agreement was noted on the importance of poor nutrition as a risk factor for cEBRT-related wound complications.
- Posterior midline surgical approaches and junctional/sacral spine locations were associated with higher perceived wound complication risks.
Conclusions:
- Strong expert agreement exists on critical aspects like waiting times and risk factors for cEBRT.
- Clinical decisions should carefully consider spinal levels, surgical approaches, and suture techniques.
- These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing combined treatment protocols for spinal metastases.
More Related Videos
08:54Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022