Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Validation of Psychometric Properties of Partners in Health Scale for Heart Failure
Pupalan Iyngkaran1,2,3, David Smith4, Craig McLachlan2
1Melbourne Clinical School, University of Notre Dame, Melbourne, VIC 3029, Australia.
Insights
The Partners in Health (PIH) scale demonstrates reliability and validity for measuring self-management in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). This generic tool can now be used to assess self-care in CHF patients, improving management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Psychometrics
- Chronic Disease Management
Background:
- Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a complex chronic condition frequently accompanied by comorbidities.
- While CHF-specific and generic self-management tools exist, validated generic instruments for CHF self-management are lacking.
- The Partners in Health (PIH) scale is a generic tool for chronic disease self-management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the internal reliability and construct validity of the Partners in Health (PIH) scale in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF).
- To assess the psychometric properties of a generic self-management tool for a specific chronic disease population.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 210 adult CHF patients (HFrEF and HFpEF) were included from community cardiology outpatients.
- Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis was employed to evaluate the a priori four-factor structure of the PIH scale.
- Internal reliability was assessed using Omega coefficients and 95% credible intervals (CI).
Main Results:
- The Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis indicated adequate model fit for the hypothesised four-factor structure.
- All hypothesised factor loadings were substantial (>0.6) and statistically significant (p < 0.001).
- Omega coefficients for PIH subscales (Knowledge, Partnership, Management, Coping) ranged from 0.79 to 0.89, indicating good to excellent internal reliability.
Conclusions:
- The Partners in Health (PIH) scale is confirmed as a reliable and valid instrument for measuring generic self-management in outpatients with congestive heart failure (CHF).
- This study provides evidence for the dimensionality and known-group validity of the PIH scale in the CHF population.
- The PIH scale can be utilized to assess self-management in CHF patients, potentially enhancing care and outcomes.
Abstract:
Background: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a complex chronic disease, and it is associated with a second comorbid condition in more than half of cases. Self-management programs can be specific to CHF or generic for chronic diseases. Several tools have been validated for CHF. Presently, there are no established generic instruments that are validated for measuring self-management in CHF. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the internal reliability and construct validity (psychometric properties) of the Partners in Health (PIH) scale for patients with congestive heart failure, a generic chronic disease self-management tool. Methods: The study included 210 adult CHF patients [120 with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HfrEF), 90 with preserved ejection fraction (HfpEF)], from Community Cardiology Outpatients in West Melbourne, Australia, who were treated in community cardiology and were included between May 2022 and Jan 2024. The screened patient population were diagnosed with CHF and were eligible for an SGLT-2 inhibitor. Cohort analysis used the Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate the a priori four-factor structure. Omega coefficients and 95% credible intervals (CI) were used to assess internal reliability. Results: In the CHF (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) cohorts, participants' mean [standard deviation (SD)] age was 66.8 (13.5) and 71.3 (9.76) years. Description of study sociodemographics highlighted that 88% and 52% of patients were male, there was a BMI > 50% in both cohorts, eGFR > 60 mL/min were 59% and 74%, and LVEF < 40% and > 50% were 99% and 100%, respectively. Model fit for the hypothesised model was adequate (posterior predictive p = 0.073) and all hypothesised factor loadings were substantial (>0.6) and significant (p < 0.001). Omega coefficients (95% CI) for the PIH subscales of Knowledge, Partnership, Management and Coping were 0.84 (0.79-0.88), 0.79 (0.73-0.84), 0.89 (0.85-0.91) and 0.84 (0.79-0.88), respectively. Conclusion: This study is original in confirming the dimensionality, known-group validity, and reliability of the PIH scale for measuring generic self-management in outpatients with CHF syndrome.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Reliability and Validity
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure

