Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography
Published on: May 15, 2017
An Efficient Printing Defect Detection Based on YOLOv5-DCN-LSK.
Jie Liu1, Zelong Cai1, Kuanfang He1
1School of Mechatronics Engineering and Automation, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China.
This study introduces an improved YOLOv5 model for detecting subtle inkjet printing defects, enhancing accuracy and speed. The enhanced model significantly boosts performance in identifying printing flaws, ensuring product information readability.
Area of Science:
- Computer Vision
- Artificial Intelligence
- Manufacturing Quality Control
Background:
- Inkjet printing labels are susceptible to defects impacting product information readability.
- Existing deep learning defect detection systems struggle with the subtle and varied shapes of these printing defects, limiting accuracy and speed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an improved deep learning model for high-accuracy and rapid detection of printing defects in inkjet labels.
- To enhance the detection capabilities for narrow, elongated, and small printing defects.
Main Methods:
- An improved YOLOv5 network architecture was proposed, incorporating C3-DCN modules for enhanced detection of elongated defects.
- Large Selective Kernel (LSK) and RepConv modules were integrated into the feature fusion network.
- A combined loss function using Normalized Gaussian Wasserstein Distance (NWD) and Efficient IoU (EIoU) was employed to improve small target detection.
- Model pruning techniques were applied to reduce model size and increase detection speed.
Main Results:
- The improved YOLOv5 model achieved a mean Average Precision (mAP@0.5) of 0.741.
- The enhanced model demonstrated a detection speed of 323.2 Frames Per Second (FPS).
- Performance metrics showed a 2.7% increase in mAP and a 20.8% increase in FPS compared to the original YOLOv5.
Conclusions:
- The proposed enhanced YOLOv5 model effectively addresses the challenges of detecting subtle and varied printing defects.
- The method meets the stringent requirements for high precision and high efficiency in industrial printing defect detection.
- This advancement contributes to improved quality control in inkjet label production.
More Related Videos
04:32Author Spotlight: Quantitative Characterization of Liquid Photosensitive Bioink Properties for Continuous Digital Light Processing Based Printing
Published on: April 14, 2023
10:57Elaborate Control of Inkjet Printer for Fabrication of Chip-based Supercapacitors
Published on: November 30, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Reducing Line Loss
With a step-up transformer at the source, the voltage is increased, thereby reducing the current in the transmission lines since power loss...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...