Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Scalable Drug Screening Protocol for Efficient Discovery of M. abscessus Treatments
Published on: October 25, 2024
Levofloxacin Preventive Treatment in Children Exposed to MDR Tuberculosis
Anneke C Hesseling1, Susan E Purchase1, Neil A Martinson1
1From the Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch (A.C.H., S.E.P., H.S.S., A.G.-P., E.B., A.-M.D., S.N., J.A.S., L. Frigati), the Perinatal HIV Research Unit (N.A.M.) and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Wits Research Health Institute (L. Fairlie), University of the Witwatersrand, and Isango Lethemba TB Research Unit, Port Elizabeth, Wits Health Consortium (F.C.), Johannesburg, and the Tuberculosis and HIV Investigative Network, Durban (S.S.) - all in South Africa; the Johns Hopkins Center for TB Research, Baltimore (N.A.M.); the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (J.B., D.M.G., C.M., C.L., R.T., T.D.) and the Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London (J.A.S.) - both in London; the Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison (A.G.P.); and the Division of Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, and the Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal - both in Montreal (A.-M.D.).
Background:
Worldwide, approximately 2 million children younger than 15 years of age are infected with multidrug-resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis, with MDR tuberculosis developing in approximately 30,000 annually. Evidence from randomized, controlled trials on tuberculosis preventive treatment in persons exposed to MDR tuberculosis is lacking.
Methods:
In this community-based, multisite, double-blind, cluster-randomized, placebo-controlled trial in South Africa, we assessed the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin as preventive treatment in children with household exposure to an adult with bacteriologically confirmed MDR pulmonary tuberculosis. Children younger than 5 years of age were eligible for inclusion regardless of interferon-γ release assay result or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status, and children 5 to 17 years of age were eligible if they had a positive interferon-γ release assay or HIV infection. Households were randomly assigned to a trial regimen, and children in the household received levofloxacin or placebo once daily for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was incident tuberculosis, which included death from tuberculosis, by week 48 after randomization. The primary safety end point was any adverse event of grade 3 or higher during the treatment period that was at least possibly related to the trial regimen.
Results:
Of 922 participants from 497 households, 453 were assigned to receive levofloxacin and 469 to placebo; 91.0% of the participants were younger than 5 years of age. At least 80% of the assigned doses of levofloxacin or placebo were received by 86% of the participants in each trial group. By week 48, tuberculosis had developed in 5 participants (1.1%) in the levofloxacin group and in 12 participants (2.6%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 1.25). The results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with those of the primary analysis. Grade 3 or higher adverse events during the treatment period that were considered to be at least possibly related to the trial regimen occurred in 4 participants in the levofloxacin group and in 8 participants in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.71). Grade 2 tendonitis occurred in 1 child in the levofloxacin group.
Conclusions:
Although preventive treatment with levofloxacin led to a lower incidence of tuberculosis than placebo among children with household exposure to MDR tuberculosis, the difference was not significant. (Supported by Unitaid and others; TB-CHAMP ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN92634082.).
Insights
Levofloxacin showed a trend toward reducing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) in children exposed to MDR TB, but the results were not statistically significant. Further research is needed to confirm its efficacy as a preventive treatment.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric infectious diseases
- Tuberculosis research
- Clinical trial methodology
Background:
- Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) poses a significant global health threat, particularly to children, with limited evidence on effective preventive treatments.
- Approximately 2 million children under 15 are infected with MDR TB, and about 30,000 new cases develop annually.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin as a preventive treatment for children exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB).
- To assess the impact of levofloxacin on the incidence of tuberculosis in a pediatric population with household exposure to MDR TB.
Main Methods:
- A community-based, multisite, double-blind, cluster-randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in South Africa.
- Children with household exposure to bacteriologically confirmed MDR pulmonary tuberculosis received either levofloxacin or placebo daily for 24 weeks.
- The primary endpoint was incident tuberculosis by week 48; safety was assessed by adverse events of grade 3 or higher.
Main Results:
- Tuberculosis developed in 1.1% of children receiving levofloxacin versus 2.6% receiving placebo by week 48 (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.25).
- The difference in tuberculosis incidence between the levofloxacin and placebo groups was not statistically significant.
- Adverse events of grade 3 or higher possibly related to the regimen occurred in 4 participants in the levofloxacin group and 8 in the placebo group.
Conclusions:
- Preventive treatment with levofloxacin did not significantly reduce the incidence of tuberculosis in children exposed to MDR TB compared to placebo.
- While a trend towards lower incidence was observed, the findings highlight the need for further investigation into effective MDR TB preventive strategies for children.
More Related Videos
06:26Author Spotlight: Optimizing CFU Determination for Efficient Assessment of TB Vaccine Efficacy and Antigen Presentation Analysis
Published on: July 28, 2023
10:04Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates
Published on: September 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis II
Here is a detailed explanation of its pathophysiology:
Transmission: The process begins when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis. These are typically released into the air when an individual with pulmonary or...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories: