Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nasal Reconstruction Using a Synthetic Dermal Substitute: An Updated Algorithm and Clinical Outcomes.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

"The Use of Biologic Agents in Nasal Reconstruction: A Review of 138 Cases".

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Scalp Reconstruction With a Synthetic Dermal Substitute After Cylindroma Excision in Brooke-Spiegler Syndrome.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

"Assessing the Extent and Safety of Flap Re-Elevation in 2-Stage Paramedian Forehead Flap Revisions".

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

The use of an acellular wound matrix for Mohs surgical reconstruction: a case series.

Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice·2025
Same author

Adapting an in-person acceptance and commitment therapy-based psychological intervention for fear of cancer recurrence into a digital format: a real-world evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2025
Same journal

The Free-Style Flaps: A Personal Journey in Clinical Practice, Surgical Pearls and Common Pitfalls.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

The Role of Microsurgical Free Flap in Complex Nose Defect Reconstruction.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

International Microsurgery Club for 10 Years-A New Online Education Platform and Beyond.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Isolated Lower Extremity Specimens Enhance Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness in Cadaveric Flap Dissection Training for Clinical Practice-Chang Gung Experience.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Neuroplastic and Augmented Reality Integration in Moyamoya Revascularization: A Reconstructive Microsurgical Paradigm.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Chang Gung Experience (Part 4): Organization of a Microsurgical Center for Service Education and Research and Miscellaneous Microsurgical Reconstruction.

Seminars in plastic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.5K

Judging Surgical Quality in Facial Reconstruction.

Lauren McAllister1, Nicholas Yim1, James F Thornton1

  • 1Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Seminars in Plastic Surgery
|December 19, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Judging surgical quality in facial reconstruction is complex, requiring surgeons to anticipate and manage factors beyond the procedure itself. Patient satisfaction and risk profiles are key to assessing successful outcomes.

Keywords:
10,000-hour rulefacial reconstructionfunctionsurgical qualitysymmetry

More Related Videos

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.0K
Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures
08:18

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures

Published on: May 16, 2025

115

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.5K
Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.0K
Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures
08:18

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures

Published on: May 16, 2025

115

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Surgical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Assessing surgical quality in facial reconstruction presents unique challenges.
  • Factors influencing outcomes extend beyond the technical execution of the surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the multifaceted nature of judging surgical quality in facial reconstruction.
  • To identify key elements crucial for evaluating successful reconstructive procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of factors influencing surgical quality.
  • Review of established principles in facial reconstruction assessment.

Main Results:

  • Surgical quality assessment requires consideration of pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative elements.
  • Patient-reported satisfaction and risk stratification are critical metrics.

Conclusions:

  • Evaluating facial reconstruction quality necessitates a holistic approach, integrating surgeon experience with patient-centered outcomes.
  • Predicting and mitigating confounding factors is essential for optimizing results.