Related Experiment Videos

The need for analgesic cover after ENT surgery--comparison of nefopam and papaveretum

Anaesthesia
|January 1, 1985
PubMed

Insights

Papaveretum and nefopam were compared for smooth emergence from ENT anesthesia in children. Papaveretum showed higher satisfaction, while nefopam offered a useful alternative due to no respiratory depression.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Anesthesiology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Smooth emergence from anesthesia is critical for pediatric patients undergoing ENT surgery.
  • Current anesthetic emergence strategies require evaluation for efficacy and safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of papaveretum and nefopam for promoting smooth emergence from ENT anesthesia in children.
  • To assess the safety profile, particularly respiratory depression, of both agents.

Main Methods:

  • A consecutive series of 40 children undergoing ENT anesthesia were alternately administered intramuscular papaveretum (0.3 mg/kg) or nefopam (0.4 mg/kg).
  • Emergence was observed and assessed for satisfaction over 30 minutes post-surgery.

Main Results:

  • Satisfactory emergence was achieved in 19/20 children receiving papaveretum.
  • Satisfactory emergence was achieved in 15/20 children receiving nefopam.
  • Nefopam did not cause respiratory depression, unlike some other agents.

Conclusions:

  • Papaveretum is effective and popular for smooth emergence in pediatric ENT surgery.
  • Nefopam serves as a valuable alternative, especially for its lack of respiratory depression.
  • This study represents the first report on nefopam use in pediatric patients for anesthetic emergence.

Related Concept Videos