Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.1K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.1K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

5.6K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
5.6K
Statgraphics01:10

Statgraphics

105
Statgraphics is a comprehensive statistical software suite designed for both basic and advanced data analysis. Originating in 1980 at Princeton University under Dr. Neil W. Polhemus, it was one of the pioneering tools for statistical computing on personal computers, with its public release in 1982 marking an early milestone in data science software. Over the years, it has evolved into a robust platform for data science, offering tools for regression analysis, ANOVA, multivariate statistics,...
105
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation01:09

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

5.1K
The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
5.1K
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.0K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.0K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

7.6K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
7.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An improved approach to modelling patient reclassification: HbA<sub>1c</sub> as an example.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Is statistical evaluation sufficient? New external quality assessment performance metrics through clinical performance.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

The distinction between systematic and random measurement errors depends on context and perspective.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
Same author

Result harmonization in medical laboratories: accomplishments and challenges.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Peer Review of "Investigating the Variable Component of the Systematic Error, a Neglected Error Parameter: Theoretical Reevaluation Study".

JMIRx med·2026
Same author

Response to letter to editor to "Procalcitonin assay variation in an Australasian external quality assurance program": A reappraisal.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Ethical evaluation of reflex and reflective testing in conformity with ISO 15189:2022 at the value-based laboratory medicine era.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Emerging blood-based diagnostic strategies for tuberculosis.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Homocitrulline and 3-year mortality in older hospitalised adults: an exploratory study.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Impact of age partitioning on classification discordance in pediatric ferritin reference intervals.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

National implementation of LOINC: translation methodology and experience from the Polish laboratory terminology standardization project.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Harmonization of measurement units: mission impossible or ethical imperative?

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Sigma Metrics misconceptions and limitations.

Xincen Duan1, Elvar Theodorsson2, Wei Guo1

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
|December 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Sigma Metric (SM) in clinical chemistry does not accurately reflect assay stability or failure likelihood. This study clarifies SM

Keywords:
Sigma Metricanalytical errorquality control

More Related Videos

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

70.0K
Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS
14:58

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS

Published on: February 17, 2018

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

70.0K
Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS
14:58

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS

Published on: February 17, 2018

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Quality Control
  • Assay Performance Evaluation

Background:

  • The Sigma Metric (SM) is commonly used in clinical chemistry for assay evaluation.
  • However, SM is not a valid predictor of assay stability or failure rates.
  • Misconceptions about SM can lead to inadequate quality control (QC) strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the Sigma Metric (SM) and its application in clinical chemistry.
  • To clarify the relationship between SM, assay stability, and the probability of control failure.
  • To address the misconception that high SM values permit reduced QC frequency.

Main Methods:

  • Exploration of the Sigma Metric (SM) in the context of clinical chemistry assays.
  • Discussion of assay stability and control failure relationships.
  • Analysis of the power of QC rules based on SM values.

Main Results:

  • The Sigma Metric (SM) is not a valid measure of assay stability or failure likelihood.
  • Assays with higher SM values have a greater power for error detection with standard QC rules.
  • There is no evidence correlating assay precision with its failure rate.

Conclusions:

  • The application of Six Sigma in clinical chemistry, specifically the TEa Six Sigma approach, deviates from classical Six Sigma statistical principles.
  • Classical Six Sigma methodologies would enable more consistent comparisons across different applications.