Validation of ACC/AHA and ESC Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Guidelines in Diverse Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Cohort:
Murillo Oliveira Antunes1,2, Fabio Fernandes1, Edmundo Arteaga-Fernandez1
1Instituto do Coração, Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Insights
Current sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk guidelines from ACC/AHA and ESC show limited predictive power in Brazilian hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. Further research is needed to improve SCD prevention strategies for this population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Public Health
Background:
- Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a significant risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients.
- Existing risk stratification guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) differ.
- The comparative effectiveness of these guidelines in diverse populations is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of the 2020 ACC/AHA and 2014 ESC guidelines for SCD risk stratification.
- To assess these guidelines in a Brazilian cohort of patients with HCM.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 187 Brazilian HCM patients.
- Primary outcome: SCD, aborted cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation (VF), sustained ventricular tachycardia (SVT), or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy.
- Risk prediction models assessed using the C-index and Area Under the Curve (AUC).
Main Results:
- The 2020 ACC/AHA guidelines identified 56% as high-risk, versus 29% by the 2014 ESC guidelines.
- The primary outcome occurred in 12% (ACC/AHA high-risk) and 13% (ESC high-risk) of patients.
- Both guidelines demonstrated low discriminatory power (AUC 0.634 for ACC/AHA, 0.581 for ESC) in this cohort.
Conclusions:
- The 2020 ACC/AHA and 2014 ESC guidelines have limitations for predicting SCD events in Brazilian HCM patients.
- Current guidelines may not be optimal for defining implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indications in this population.
- Further research is required to refine risk stratification and optimize SCD prevention strategies for Brazilian HCM patients.
Background:
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major concern in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have different guidelines for SCD risk stratification. Their comparative performance in diverse populations remains uncertain.
Objective:
Evaluate the performance of the 2020 ACC/AHA and 2014 ESC guidelines for SCD stratification in a Brazilian cohort with HCM.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with HCM who were followed in a dedicated clinic at a tertiary hospital in Brazil. The primary outcome was SCD, aborted cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF), sustained ventricular tachycardia (SVT), an episode of VF or SVT, or appropriate ICD therapy. Risk prediction models were assessed using the C-index.
Results:
A total of 187 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 8.3 years. The 2020 ACC/AHA guidelines classified 106 (56%) patients as high-risk for SCD, while the 2014 ESC guidelines identified 54 (29%). The primary outcome occurred in 12% of the high-risk group identified by the ACC/AHA guidelines and 13% of the high-risk group identified by the ESC guidelines. Both guidelines showed low discriminatory power for SCD risk in this Brazilian cohort, with AUC values of 0.634 and 0.581 for the ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines, respectively.
Conclusions:
The 2020 ACC/AHA and 2014 ESC guidelines have limitations in predicting SCD events and defining ICD indications in Brazilian HCM patients. Further studies are needed to refine risk stratification and optimize SCD prevention in this population.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care


