Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026
Preterm EEG: A Multimodal Neurophysiological Protocol
Published on: February 18, 2012
Physiological versus time based cord clamping in very preterm infants (ABC3): a parallel-group, multicentre,
Ronny Knol1, Emma Brouwer2, Thomas van den Akker3,4
1Division of Neonatology, Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Background:
Physiological-based cord clamping (PBCC) in preterm infants is beneficial for cardiovascular transition at birth and may optimize placental transfusion. Whether PBCC can improve clinical outcomes is unknown. The aim of the Aeration, Breathing, Clamping (ABC3) trial was to test whether PBCC results in improved intact survival in very preterm infants.
Methods:
The ABC3 trial was a parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled superiority clinical trial conducted in all Dutch tertiary referral centers for perinatal care involving infants born before 30 weeks of gestation. Infants were randomised to either PBCC or time-based delayed cord clamping (TBCC), stratified by gestational age and treatment center. Infants receiving PBCC were stabilised with umbilical cord intact, which was clamped after reaching cardiorespiratory stability (heart rate >100 bpm and SpO2 >85% while supplemental oxygen <40%). In TBCC the cord was clamped after 30-60 s. The primary outcome was survival without major cerebral injury and/or necrotizing enterocolitis. The primary and key secondary analyses were done in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03808051).
Findings:
From January 25, 2019, through October 2, 2022, 669 infants were randomised (median gestational age 27+5 weeks (IQR 26+2-28+6)) and included in the intention-to-treat population. Intact survival occurred in 241 of 339 infants (71.1%) after PBCC, compared with 223 of 330 (67.6%) after TBCC (odds ratio 1.18, 95% CI 0.84-1.66; absolute risk difference 3.1 %points, 95% CI -11.0 to 15.8, p = 0.33). Pre-specified subgroup analysis showed 69.9% intact survival in male infants after PBCC, compared with 61.8% after TBCC (odds ratio 2.32, 95% CI 1.42-3.78, p for interaction 0.026). Secondary outcomes showed fewer red blood cell transfusions after PBCC (rate ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.92, p = 0.0003), lower incidence of late-onset sepsis (27.4% versus 33.3%, odds ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.95, p = 0.013) and lower admission temperature (36.3 °C versus 36.7 °C, mean difference -0.5, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.3, p < 0.0001). Parents were less anxious (Likert scale 1.52 (SD 0.97) versus 2.23 (SD 1.35); p < 0.001) and more content (Likert scale 4.74 (SD 0.75) versus 4.49 (SD 0.97); p < 0.001) after PBCC.
Interpretation:
PBCC in very preterm infants did not increase survival without major cerebral injury or necrotizing enterocolitis compared to TBCC in the entire cohort. A possible beneficial effect in male infants requires confirmation from other trials. PBCC was safe to perform and parents reported more contentment and less anxiety.
Funding:
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.
