Warning Signs, Monitoring Tools, and Actions Taken by World-Class Endurance Coaches in Cases of Underperformance

To describe warning signs, monitoring tools, and training- and non-training-related actions taken by world-class endurance coaches in cases of underperformance.

Twelve highly acclaimed male Norwegian coaches known for coaching world-class endurance athletes with a remarkable collection of over 350 Olympic, World, and European Championship medals-primarily with Norwegian athletes-participated in the study. Data collection and analyses followed a 3-step pragmatic qualitative study design, including an initial questionnaire, in-depth interviews, and structured negotiation between researchers and coaches.

Reduced performance levels and discrepancies between external (speed or power output) and internal (heart rate, lactate concentrations, and rating of perceived exertion) training-intensity measures in competitions, key training sessions, and testing scenarios, as well as observed changes in emotional state and coach-athlete communication, were highlighted as early warning signs of underperformance. Consistently, daily follow-up, systematic use of training diaries, training-intensity measures, and information from testing scenarios were rated as the most important monitoring tools in both detection and management of underperformance. In cases of underperformance, ruling out medical conditions as underlying causes was followed by a decreased training load (intensity and volume) and actions to reduce life stress to restore athletes' performance levels.

The presented data collectively propose applying both objectively and subjectively measured monitoring tools and systems to the early detection and management of underperformance in endurance athletes. In addition, this should be complemented by the holistic and observational role of the coach.