Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Stepwise Dosing Protocol for Increased Throughput in Label-Free Impedance-Based GPCR Assays
Published on: February 21, 2020
Probing the Histamine H1 Receptor Binding Site to Explore Ligand Binding Kinetics
Sebastiaan Kuhne1, Reggie Bosma1, Albert J Kooistra1
1Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Structure-kinetic relationship analysis reveals strategies to increase ligand residence time (RT) at the histamine H1 receptor (H1R). Introducing a carboxylic acid group enhanced RT but decreased ligand efficiency, highlighting varied approaches for receptor modulation.
Area of Science:
- Medicinal Chemistry
- Pharmacology
- Structural Biology
Background:
- Understanding receptor-ligand interactions is crucial for drug discovery.
- Histamine H1 receptor (H1R) is a key target for allergic conditions.
- Long residence time (RT) ligands can offer improved therapeutic profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate structure-kinetic relationships (SKR) for histamine H1 receptor (H1R) ligands.
- To explore fragment growing approaches to mimic known H1R ligands.
- To analyze the impact of structural modifications on ligand binding kinetics.
Main Methods:
- Utilized fragment growing techniques starting with fragment 1 (4-(2-benzylphenoxy)-1-methylpiperidine).
- Designed and synthesized novel ligands to mimic olopatadine, acrivastine, and levocetirizine binding.
- Performed kinetic analyses to determine residence time (RT), ligand efficiency (LE), and kinetic efficiency (KE).
Main Results:
- Introduction of a carboxylic acid moiety increased H1R RT up to 11-fold.
- Negative charge introduction decreased ligand efficiency (LE) but increased kinetic efficiency (KE) up to 8.5-fold.
- Mimics of olopatadine/acrivastine showed greater RT variability (15-fold) compared to levocetirizine mimics (3-fold), indicating differential sensitivity to structural changes.
Conclusions:
- Multiple strategies exist to enhance ligand RT at H1R.
- Different structural modifications yield distinct SKR profiles.
- Levocetirizine mimics demonstrate lower sensitivity to structural variations, suggesting a more robust binding mode.
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Quantitative Aspects of Drug-Receptor Interaction
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods
Indirect methods involve isolating the bound drug from its free form in biological samples such as blood, serum, or plasma. These techniques aim to measure the percentage of drugs bound to proteins. Equilibrium dialysis is a commonly used method where the free drug concentration at equilibrium is measured by separating the bound...
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with...

