Related Experiment Videos
Contrast enhanced brain CT comparison between iohexol and metrizoate.
Investigative Radiology
|January 1, 1985
Summary
The new nonionic contrast agent iohexol showed fewer adverse reactions than the commonly used metrizoate during cranial CT scans. Both agents demonstrated similar enhancement efficiency in this randomized study.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Contrast media are essential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy in cranial computed tomography (CT).
- Metrizoate (Isopaque Cerebral) is a widely used iodinated contrast agent.
- Iohexol is a newer, nonionic contrast agent developed to potentially improve safety profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of iohexol versus metrizoate for contrast enhancement in cranial CT.
- To evaluate the incidence of adverse reactions associated with each contrast medium.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, double-blind study was conducted.
- 105 patients received intravenous metrizoate, and 105 patients received intravenous iohexol for cranial CT.
- Adverse reactions and enhancement efficiency were recorded and compared.
Main Results:
- No serious adverse reactions were reported for either contrast medium.
- Ten patients (9.5%) receiving metrizoate experienced minor, mainly allergic-type reactions.
- Only one patient (0.95%) receiving iohexol experienced an adverse reaction.
- No significant differences in enhancement efficiency were observed between the two agents.
Conclusions:
- Iohexol appears to be a safer alternative to metrizoate for cranial CT contrast enhancement due to a significantly lower incidence of minor adverse reactions.
- Both contrast media provide comparable enhancement efficiency for cranial CT imaging.