A Comparative Review of the SWEET Simulator: Theoretical Verification Against Other Simulators

Accurate luminance-based image generation is critical in physically based simulations, as even minor inaccuracies in radiative transfer calculations can introduce noise or artifacts, adversely affecting image quality. The radiative transfer simulator, SWEET, uses a backward Monte Carlo approach, and its performance is analyzed alongside other simulators to assess how Monte Carlo-induced biases vary with parameters like optical thickness and medium anisotropy. This work details the advancements made to SWEET since the previous publication, with a specific focus on a more comprehensive comparison with other simulators such as Mitsuba. The core objective is to evaluate the precision of SWEET by comparing radiometric quantities like luminance, which serves as a method for validating the simulator. This analysis is particularly important in contexts such as automotive camera imaging, where accurate scene representation is crucial to reducing noise and ensuring the reliability of image-based systems in autonomous driving. By focusing on detailed radiometric comparisons, this study underscores SWEET's ability to minimize noise, thus providing high-quality imaging for advanced applications.