Effect of Androgen receptors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Given Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review and

Ottofianus Alvedo Hewick Kalangi1, Tioky Sutjonong1, Erica A Indrawan1

  • 1Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Abstract

Insights

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be less effective for androgen receptor-positive (AR+) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) compared to AR-negative (AR-) TNBC. Survival outcomes for AR+ TNBC were not significantly different from AR- TNBC in this analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks established treatment targets like estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), or HER2.
  • Androgen receptor (AR) is a potential therapeutic target in TNBC, but its role in treatment response is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment in TNBC patients based on androgen receptor (AR) expression status (AR-positive vs. AR-negative).

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 cohort studies involving 2,713 TNBC patients.
  • Pooled odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using fixed-effects models (Mantel-Haenzel and Inverse Variance methods).

Main Results:

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed reduced efficacy in AR-positive (AR+) TNBC compared to AR-negative (AR-) TNBC (OR = 0.60, p = 0.02).
  • No statistically significant differences were observed in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) between AR+ and AR- TNBC subtypes.

Conclusions:

  • The prognostic significance of AR expression in TNBC remains uncertain.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the role of AR in TNBC treatment and prognosis.