Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

08:17
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Published on: June 7, 2015
15.7K
Patient Positional Uncertainty and Margin Reduction in Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy Using Pneumatic
Yohan A Walter1, Chiachien J Wang2, Daniel B Speir2
1Department of Clinical Research, University of Jamestown, Fargo, North Dakota; Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Practical Radiation Oncology
|December 29, 2024
Summary
Modern lung stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) techniques allow for reduced planning target volume (PTV) margins. Intrafraction repositioning significantly decreases margin requirements, minimizing healthy tissue exposure.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
Background:
- Motion management is crucial in thoracic stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR).
- Current standard planning target volume (PTV) margins of 5.0 mm may be excessive with advanced techniques.
- Reassessing PTV margins is warranted due to advancements in tumor localization and motion management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze intrafraction repositioning data for lung SABR under forced shallow breathing.
- To determine appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margin requirements for modern lung SABR delivery techniques.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 607 lung SABR fractions from 124 patients treated with pneumatic abdominal compression and 4-dimensional (4D) cone beam computed tomography (4D CBCT)-guided intrafraction repositioning.
- Calculation of margin requirements using the 2-standard deviation (SD) method and an analytical model accounting for systematic and random errors.
Main Results:
- 85.7% of fractions had 3D repositioning shifts under 5.0 mm.
- Margins calculated by the 2-SD method were 3.62 mm (right-left), 4.34 mm (inferior-superior), and 3.50 mm (posterior-anterior).
- Analytical modeling suggested margins of 4.01 mm, 4.37 mm, and 3.95 mm; intrafraction repositioning reduced margin needs by 0.73 mm.
Conclusions:
- The standard 5.0-mm PTV margin is likely conservative for workflows utilizing advanced techniques like 4D CT and 4D CBCT-guided intrafraction repositioning.
- These modern techniques can significantly reduce required margins, thereby decreasing radiation dose to healthy tissues.
- Caution is advised when reducing margins; a formal risk assessment is recommended before adopting new PTV margin standards.

