Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
Published on: February 23, 2024
Predicting BRAF Mutations in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients Using Neural Network Analysis
Oleksandr Dudin1,2, Ozar Mintser2, Vitalii Gurianov3
1Scientific Department, Medical Laboratory CSD, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Abstract:
Point mutations at codon 600 of the BRAF oncogene are the most common alterations in cutaneous melanoma (CM). Assessment of BRAF status allows to personalize patient management, though the affordability of molecular testing is limited in some countries. This study aimed to develop a model for predicting alteration in BRAF based on routinely available clinical and histological data. Methods: For identifying the key factors associated with point mutations in BRAF, 2041 patients with CM were recruited in the study. The presence of BRAF mutations was an endpoint. The variables included demographic data (gender and age), anatomic location, stage, histological subtype, number of mitosis, and also such features as ulceration, Clark level, Breslow thickness, infiltration by lymphocytes, invasiveness, regression, microsatellites, and association with nevi. Results: A relatively high rate of BRAF mutation was revealed in the Ukrainian cohort of patients with CM. BRAF-mutant melanoma was associated with younger age and location of nonsun-exposed skin. Besides, sex-specific differences were found between CM of various anatomic distributions and the frequency of distinct BRAF mutation subtypes. A minimal set of variables linked to BRAF mutations, defined by the genetic input selection algorithm, included patient age, primary tumor location, histological type, lymphovascular invasion, ulceration, and association with nevi. To encounter nonlinear links, neural network modeling was applied resulting in a multilayer perceptron (MLP) with one hidden layer. Its architecture included four neurons with a logistic activation function. The AUROCMLP6 of the MLP model comprised 0.79 (95% CІ: 0.74-0.84). Under the optimal threshold, the model demonstrated the following parameters: sensitivity: 89.4% (95% CІ: 84.5%-93.1%), specificity: 50.7% (95% CІ: 42.2%-59.1%), positive predictive value: 73.1% (95% CІ: 69.6%-76.3%), and negative predictive value: 76.0% (95% CІ: 67.6%-82.8%). The developed MLP model enables the prediction of the mutation in BRAF oncogene in CM, alleviating decisions on personalized management of patients with CM. In conclusion, the developed MLP model, which relies on the assessment of 6 variables, can predict the BRAF mutation status in patients with CM, supporting decisions on patient management.
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Hindsight Biases
Microsoft Excel: Regression Analysis
To perform regression...
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
Regression Analysis
In regression analysis, a regression equation is determined based on the line of best fit– a line that best fits the data points plotted in a graph. This line is also called the regression line. The algebraic equation for the regression line is called the regression equation. It is represented as:
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...

