Durvalumab and tremelimumab in patients with advanced rare cancer: a multi-centre, non-blinded, open-label phase II basket trial
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
Abha A Gupta1, Anna Tinker2, Derek Jonker3
1University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Background:
Dual inhibition of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been shown to be an effective treatment strategy in many cancers. We sought to determine the objective response rate of combination durvalumab (D) plus tremelimumab (TM) in parallel cohorts of patients with carefully selected rare cancer types in which these agents had not previously been evaluated in phase II trials and for which there was clinical or biological rationale for dual immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy to be active.
Methods:
We designed a multi-centre, non-blinded, open-label phase II basket trial with each of the following 8 rare cancers considered a separate phase II trial: salivary carcinoma, carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) with tumour infiltrating lymphocytes and/or expressing PD-L1, mucosal melanoma, acral melanoma, osteosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCCO) or squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA). The primary objective was to evaluate the response rate of the combination of D and TM, and the secondary objectives were to evaluate the tolerability and safety of D and TM combination. Eligible patients had advanced, metastatic or recurrent, or unresectable cancer with no known life-prolonging treatment option, age ≥16 years, ECOG performance status 0 or 1. Patients received D (1500 mg IV) + TM (75 mg IV) on Day 1 q4 weeks for 4 cycles followed by D q4 weeks until disease progression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02879162.
Findings:
From December 14th, 2016, to August 14, 2019, 140 patients enrolled into seven cohorts. The rare melanoma cohorts were closed due to lack of accrual. Of the 140 patients enrolled, 138 were eligible, 138 were evaluable for toxicity and 128 (91%) were evaluable for response. Durable responses were noted in all cohorts except for osteosarcoma. The overall response rate for eligible patients was 16% (95% CI: 10-23%). The response rates in each cancer cohort were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma 15% (n = 3/20; 95% CI 3-38%), salivary carcinoma 20% (n = 4/20; 95% CI: 6-44%), CUP 17% (n = 3/18; 95% CI 4-41%), SCCA 10% (n = 2/20; 95% CI 12-32%) and CCCO 21% (n = 8/39; 95% CI 9-37%). Grade 3/4 adverse events were rare, where 4 patients experienced grade 4 related events and39 patients experienced grade 3 events.
Interpretation:
Durvalumab + tremelimumab treatment resulted in meaningful responses in salivary carcinoma and CCCO and deserves further exploration in front-line studies.
Funding:
AstraZeneca and Canadian Cancer Society.
Insights
Combination immunotherapy with durvalumab and tremelimumab showed a 16% overall response rate in rare cancers. Meaningful responses were observed in salivary carcinoma and ovarian clear cell carcinoma, warranting further investigation.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Dual inhibition of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 is an effective cancer treatment strategy.
- This study evaluated combination durvalumab (D) plus tremelimumab (TM) in rare cancer types.
- These agents had not been previously evaluated in phase II trials for these specific rare cancers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the objective response rate of combination durvalumab plus tremelimumab.
- To evaluate the tolerability and safety of the D plus TM combination.
- To explore the efficacy of dual immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in rare cancers with a clinical or biological rationale.
Main Methods:
- A multi-center, open-label phase II basket trial was conducted.
- Eight rare cancer types were included: salivary carcinoma, CUP, mucosal melanoma, acral melanoma, osteosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCCO), and squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA).
- Patients received D (1500 mg IV) + TM (75 mg IV) every 4 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by D until disease progression.
Main Results:
- 138 patients were eligible and evaluable for toxicity; 128 were evaluable for response.
- The overall response rate was 16% (95% CI: 10-23%).
- Response rates varied by cohort: CCCO 21%, salivary carcinoma 20%, CUP 17%, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma 15%, and SCCA 10%. Osteosarcoma and melanoma cohorts were closed due to lack of accrual.
Conclusions:
- Durvalumab plus tremelimumab demonstrated meaningful responses in salivary carcinoma and CCCO.
- The combination therapy warrants further exploration in front-line studies for these specific rare cancers.
- Grade 3/4 adverse events were rare, indicating a manageable safety profile.
More Related Videos
10:13Non-Destructive Evaluation of Regional Cell Density Within Tumor Aggregates Following Drug Treatment
Published on: June 21, 2022
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...