Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Use of Electromagnetic Navigational Transthoracic Needle Aspiration E-TTNA for Sampling of Lung Nodules
Published on: May 23, 2015
Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of CT-based Node-RADS for Esophageal Cancer
Jakob Leonhardi1, Benedikt Schnarkowski1, Matthias Mehdorn2
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Background/Aim:
The recently published Node-Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) can aid the characterization of lymph nodes in cross-sectional imaging. This study investigated the Node-RADS system in computed tomography (CT) to characterize lymph nodes in esophageal cancer.
Patients And Methods:
Overall, 126 patients (15 female, 11.9%) with a mean age of 62.1±10.4 years comprised the patient sample. All patients underwent resection with curative intent and the lymph nodes were histopathologically analyzed during clinical routine. For every patient, the locoregional lymph nodes were scored in accordance with the Node-RADS classification. For statistical analysis, receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) with area under the curve (AUC) were used to test for diagnostic accuracy; inter-reader variability was assessed with Cohen's kappa.
Results:
Overall, 54 patients were nodal positive (42.9%), 72 patients were nodal negative (57.1%). Inter-reader agreement was substantial for the overall Node-RADS scoring ([Formula: see text]=0.65, p<0.001). ROC curve analysis for lymph node discrimination (N0 versus N1-3) showed an AUC of 0.69 (95% confidence interval=0.59-0.79). A threshold score of more than 2 resulted in a sensitivity of 0.77 and a specificity of 0.55 for correctly predicting nodal positivity. Node-RADS 1 category had a malignancy rate of 30%, Node-RADS 2 of 14%, Node-RADS 3 of 81%, Node-RADS 4 of 90.1% and Node-RADS 5 of 86.5%.
Conclusion:
The Node-RADS score on staging CT is associated with the malignancy rate of lymph nodes in patients with EC with only moderate diagnostic accuracy. The inter-reader variability is moderate, which could pose difficulties for translation into clinical routine.

