Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players' Lunge Performance
Published on: June 11, 2019
Individual sex-based variability to altitude training in elite badminton players
Camille Précart1, Janne Bouten1, Caroline Giroux1
1Laboratory Sport, Expertise and Performance (EA 7370), French Institute of Sport, Paris, France.
Abstract:
To assess how altitude training impacts force-velocity-power (F-V-P) profiling and muscular power and anaerobic capacity in elite badminton players in reference to intra- and inter-individual sex-based variability. Following a quasi-experimental design, 14 players (6 females, 8 males) from the French national badminton singles and doubles teams performed a 3-week 'living high-training high' camp at natural altitude (2320 m). F-V-P profile and Wingate anaerobic test were assessed Pre- and Post-intervention, using ANOVA repeated measures conventional statistics, with further estimation statistics to show the magnitude of the testing condition and visualize intra- and inter-individual responses. No significant interaction nor time effect (Pre- vs. Post-) was observed for any variables (all p > 0.05), but a significant sex effect was observed for maximal theoretical velocity (p < 0.01), relative maximal theoretical power (Pmaxrel) (p = 0.02) and relative F-V-P profile and for peak and mean power outputs (both p < 0.001) during Wingate test. Pre-to-Post changes (from -11.0% to + 14.4%) did not significantly differ between sexes, except for Pmaxrel (p < 0.05) in favor of female athletes (+10.2% vs. -4.3% for male athletes). Hedge's g effect sizes (male minus female) revealed moderate and large effects for F-V-P profiling-derived variables. Mean conventional statistics did not reveal significant effect of altitude training, mainly due to high intra- and inter-variability across F-V-P profiling-derived variables and Wingate test. Substantial sex-based difference contributes to this variability, emphasizing the importance of individualized approach to enhance participant responsiveness to altitude training.
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
Factors Affecting Respiration
Nature and Nurture

