Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
Published on: February 8, 2018
In Situ Detection of Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Interactions as a Functional
Amanda Lindberg1, Lars Muhl2, Hui Yu1
1Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Detecting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) interactions offers more precise lung cancer treatment insights than standard assays. This method can predict immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response and identify resistance mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Biomarker Discovery
Background:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized lung cancer therapy but show variable efficacy.
- Current biomarkers like programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression have limited predictive power.
- Assessing direct programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)-PD-L1 interactions may offer superior prediction of treatment response.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of detecting PD1-PD-L1 interactions as a biomarker for ICI treatment in various cancers.
- To compare the predictive value of PD1-PD-L1 interactions with standard PD-L1 expression assays.
- To identify mechanisms of ICI resistance in non-responding patients.
Main Methods:
- A proximity ligation assay was used to detect PD1-PD-L1 interactions in diagnostic samples from 16 cancer types.
- Analysis included early-stage and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient cohorts, with and without ICI treatment.
- RNA sequencing was employed to investigate resistance mechanisms.
Main Results:
- PD1-PD-L1 interactions were detected in a subset of NSCLC cases with PD-L1 and PD1 expression, with lower levels in EGFR-mutated tumors.
- Higher PD1-PD-L1 interaction levels correlated with complete response and improved survival in ICI-treated NSCLC patients.
- Non-responders with high interactions showed additional expression of immune mediators like EOMES and HAVCR1.
Conclusions:
- Assessing active immune pathways via PD1-PD-L1 interactions provides more precise ICI treatment guidance than static biomarker quantification.
- This functional diagnostic approach is applicable to small biopsies and can be extended to other immune checkpoints.
- Findings suggest combined diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are needed to overcome ICI resistance.
More Related Videos
10:29Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019
06:07Monitoring PD-1-Blocking Antibodies Bound to T Cells Derived from a Drop of Peripheral Blood
Published on: February 5, 2020