Risk factors for complications following volar locking plate fixation of distal radial fractures

With the aging population comes an increase in the number of distal radial fractures and therefore in the number of cases requiring volar locking plate (VLP) fixation. The complication rates after VLP fixation vary greatly from one study to the next. Several authors have already focused on these complications and how to lower their rate. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for complications after VLP fixation of distal radial fractures that lead to implant removal.

Implant removal (except systematic removal) after VLP fixation can be predicted by risk factors for complication.

There were 2951 patients included in the study and divided into two groups: fixation without implant removal and fixation with implant removal. Then, intrinsic factors (age, sex, dominant side, tilt, type of fracture based on the AO classification (extra-articular - partial articular - complete articular - fracture); as well as one extrinsic factor (plate position according to the Soong classification compared to the watershed line) were identified. For all these factors, the relative risk (RR) was computed using univariate and multivariate models. The risk factors that reached statistical significance (p < 0.02) were used in the multivariate analysis.

The univariate and multivariate analyses identified three risk factors for complications, i.e. implant removal: being under 62 years of age (RR = 1.99; CI 1.56-2.54, p < 0.0001), type 2R3C fracture according to the AO classification (RR = 1.50; CI 1.17-1.93, p = 0.0050) and Soong grade 2 plate position (RR = 1.73; 1.32-2.26, p < 0.0001).

Our study showed that plate position recorded as grade 2 was a risk factor for complications and therefore implant removal. This is an extrinsic factor that is implant and surgeon dependent. Moreover, intrinsic factors were also identified such as age and type of fracture. Assessing these risk factors after VLP fixation of distal radial fractures may lead to early detection of these complications and an opportunity to propose implant removal as a preventive measure.

III.